问题描述
短的问题:如何才能获得一个物体的 object.GetHashCode()
价值已重新实现的GetHashCode()
Short question: How do I get the object.GetHashCode()
value for an object that has re-implemented GetHashCode()
?
龙的故事:
所以我有大约十万的对象,每个共享很多(非编译时)常见的字符串。常见的如如果该值相等,这是同一个实例。
Long story:So I have about a hundred thousand objects, each sharing many (non-compile time) common strings. Common as in if the value is equal, it is the same instance.
知道了,我想我宁愿使用标准的对象比较(的ReferenceEquals
),而不是一个完整的字符串比较 - 尤其是当这些都抬起头来在字典上相当定期
Knowing that, I figure I'd rather use a standard object comparison (ReferenceEquals
) rather than a full string compare - particularly as these are looked up in dictionaries on a fairly regular basis.
所以,我宣布一个类ReferenceEqualityComparer:的IEqualityComparer
与使用词典<字符串,TValue>
,认定它会是有反正有用和去试图实现这两种方法。
So I declare a class ReferenceEqualityComparer : IEqualityComparer
to use with a Dictionary<string, TValue>
, figuring it'd be useful to have anyway, and go about trying to implement the two methods.
等于是很容易的,使用 object.ReferenceEquals
。
Equals is easy enough, use object.ReferenceEquals
.
不过,我如何获得 object.GetHashCode()
为的GetHashCode 方法?
But how do I get the equivalent of object.GetHashCode()
for the GetHashCode
method?
即如何获取对象实例的一些代表性?
ie how do I get some representation of an object's instance?
我知道有其他的方式,我可以去这样做 - 创建一个 InternedString
类持有到字符串的引用
,但不实施等于
或的GetHashCode
,或存储索引,而不是每个对象的字符串,但我现在好奇 - 是否有真正实现一个通用的 ReferenceEqualityComparer
I know there are other ways I can go about doing this - create an InternedString
class which holds a reference to the string
, but does not implement Equals
or GetHashCode
, or store indexes rather than strings with each object, but I'm now curious - is there actually a way to implement a generic ReferenceEqualityComparer
?
推荐答案
看一看。
这篇关于如何从一类原始的哈希代码重新实现GetHashCode?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!