本文介绍了是否可以在Java 8中扩展枚举?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

只需播放,并提出了一种可以在,其中包含。



进一步的修补使我能够几乎也增加了一个整洁(即不抛出异常)反向查找,但有一个问题。报告:

 错误:X中的valueOf(String)无法在HasValue中实现valueOf(String)
public enum X实现PoliteEnum,ReverseLookup {
覆盖方法是静态

有没有办法? >

这里的目的是默认添加(通过一个接口实现与默认方法,如我添加的在链接的答案中的politeName 查找方法,执行 valueOf 函数而不抛出例外。可能吗?现在很明显,现在可以扩展枚举,这是Java的主要问题之一,直到现在为止。



这是我的失败尝试:

  public interface HasName {

public String name();
}

public interface PoliteEnum extends HasName {

default String politeName(){
return name()。replace(_, );
}
}

public interface Lookup< P,Q> {

public Q lookup(P p);
}

public interface HasValue {
HasValue valueOf(String name);
}

public interface ReverseLookup扩展HasValue,Lookup< String,HasValue> {

@Override
默认值HasValue lookup(String from){
try {
return valueOf(from);
} catch(IllegalArgumentException e){
return null;
}
}

}

public枚举X实现PoliteEnum / * NOT ALLOWED :(,ReverseLookup * / {

A_For_Ism,B_For_Mutton,C_Forth_Highlanders;
}

public void test(){
//测试(X x:X.values())的politeName
{
System.out.println(x.politeName());
}
// ToDo:测试查找
}
/ pre>

解决方案

您的设计过于复杂,如果您愿意接受您可以调用默认方法,整个代码可能如下所示:

  interface ReverseLookupSupport< ; E扩展Enum< E> {
Class< E> getDeclaringClass();
默认E lookup(String name){
try {
return Enum.valueOf(getDeclaringClass (),name);
} catch(IllegalArgumentException ex){return null;}
}
}
枚举测试实现ts ReverseLookupSupport< Test> {
FOO,BAR
}

您可以使用以下测试: p>

  Test foo = Test.FOO; 
测试条= foo.lookup(BAR),baz = foo.lookup(BAZ);
System.out.println(bar ++ baz);

一个不投掷/捕捉的替代方案是:

  interface ReverseLookupSupport< E extends Enum& E> {
Class< E> getDeclaringClass();
default可选< E> lookup(String name){
return Stream.of(getDeclaringClass()。getEnumConstants())
.filter(e-> e.name()。equals(name))findFirst()
}

使用喜欢:

  Test foo = Test.FOO; 
测试条= foo.lookup(BAR)orElse(null),baz = foo.lookup(BAZ)orElse(null);
System.out.println(bar ++ baz);


Just playing and came up with a sweet way to add functionality to enums in Java Enum toString() method with this.

Some further tinkering allowed me to nearly also add a tidy (i.e. not throwing an exception) reverse look-up but there's a problem. It's reporting:

error: valueOf(String) in X cannot implement valueOf(String) in HasValue
public enum X implements PoliteEnum, ReverseLookup {
overriding method is static

Is there a way?

The aim here is to silently add (via an interface implementation with a default method like I added politeName in the linked answer) a lookup method that does the valueOf function without throwing an exception. Is it possible? It is clearly now possible to extend enum - one of my major problems with Java until now.

Here's my failed attempt:

public interface HasName {

    public String name();
}

public interface PoliteEnum extends HasName {

    default String politeName() {
        return name().replace("_", " ");
    }
}

public interface Lookup<P, Q> {

    public Q lookup(P p);
}

public interface HasValue {
    HasValue valueOf(String name);
}

public interface ReverseLookup extends HasValue, Lookup<String, HasValue> {

    @Override
    default HasValue lookup(String from) {
        try {
            return valueOf(from);
        } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
            return null;
        }
    }

}

public enum X implements PoliteEnum/* NOT ALLOWED :( , ReverseLookup*/ {

    A_For_Ism, B_For_Mutton, C_Forth_Highlanders;
}

public void test() {
    // Test the politeName
    for (X x : X.values()) {
        System.out.println(x.politeName());
    }
    // ToDo: Test lookup
}
解决方案

You are over-complicating your design. If you are willing to accept that you can invoke a default method on an instance only, there entire code may look like this:

interface ReverseLookupSupport<E extends Enum<E>> {
    Class<E> getDeclaringClass();
    default E lookup(String name) {
        try {
            return Enum.valueOf(getDeclaringClass(), name);
        } catch(IllegalArgumentException ex) { return null; }
    }
}
enum Test implements ReverseLookupSupport<Test> {
    FOO, BAR
}

You can test it with:

Test foo=Test.FOO;
Test bar=foo.lookup("BAR"), baz=foo.lookup("BAZ");
System.out.println(bar+"  "+baz);

An non-throwing/catching alternative would be:

interface ReverseLookupSupport<E extends Enum<E>> {
    Class<E> getDeclaringClass();
    default Optional<E> lookup(String name) {
        return Stream.of(getDeclaringClass().getEnumConstants())
          .filter(e->e.name().equals(name)).findFirst();
}

to use like:

Test foo=Test.FOO;
Test bar=foo.lookup("BAR").orElse(null), baz=foo.lookup("BAZ").orElse(null);
System.out.println(bar+"  "+baz);

这篇关于是否可以在Java 8中扩展枚举?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

08-06 09:31