问题描述
在中对此进行了很好的讨论。
There's a good discussion of this in the general case.
但是，我特别想知道为什么类使用静态方法来创建一个对象，而不是构造函数？
However, I was wondering specifically why the Pattern class uses the compile static method to create an object, rather than the constructor?
我觉得使用构造函数更直观。
Seems to me to be more intuitive to use a constructor.
推荐答案
Pattern类比JDK中的许多东西都要新。因此，我相信他们采用了更现代的工厂方法，而不是公共构造函数的旧方法。
The Pattern class is newer than a lot of the stuff in the JDK. As such I believe they adopted the more modern approach of using factory methods rather than the older approach of public constructors. You can't really retrofit factory methods to existing classes.
通常来说，没有太多理由在工厂方法上使用构造函数，所以我认为这就是全部对它。工厂方法允许您抽象对象的创建，这可能非常有用。
Generally speaking, there's not a lot of reason to use a constructor over a factory method so I think that's all there was to it. Factory methods allow you to abstract object creation, which can be pretty useful.
这篇关于为什么Java Pattern类使用工厂方法而不是构造函数？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！