问题描述
我怀疑我遵循的工作流程是否正确，或者我是否弄错了情况.
I have a doubt whether the workflow that I follow is correct or if I have messed up the situation.
我正在本地和远程创建的分支上开发一项新功能.我是唯一从事此工作的人.
I was working on a new feature on the branch that i created locally and on remote. I am the only person working on it.
我使用以下方法创建了它:
I Created it using:
git checkout -b rotation upstream/master
现在我进行更改并提交:
Now I made changes and commited:
git commit
并将更改推送到远程分支:
and changes were pushed to remote branch:
git push origin rotation
我的问题现在开始.我此时输入git fetch upstream.
My problem starts now. I typed git fetch upstream at this point.
现在，当我git status得到时，
vinayan@vinayan-MS-7623:~/QgisGitWorking/Quantum-GIS$ git status
# On branch rotatation
# Your branch and 'upstream/master' have diverged,
# and have 4 and 5 different commits each, respectively.
#
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
我对分支分歧消息感到困惑.
I am confused by the branch diverged message.
- 这里有什么问题吗?
- 如果我继续会不会有问题在这里提交更改并向上游推?
- 如果出了什么问题，纠正它的最佳方法是什么?
- Is anything wrong here?
- Is there going to be an issue if i continuecommitting changes here and push upstream?
- If something is wrong, what would be the best way to correct it?
我对git很陌生.以前我只用过VSS.
I am quite new to git. Previously I have only used VSS.
vinayan@vinayan-MS-7623:~/QgisGitWorking/Quantum-GIS$ git remote -v
origin [email protected]:vinayan/Quantum-GIS.git (fetch)
origin [email protected]:vinayan/Quantum-GIS.git (push)
upstream git://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS.git (fetch)
upstream git://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS.git (push)
推荐答案
upstream的思想是允许您自己的存储库以upstream存储库中的最新存储库为基础.
这样，您可以与上游保持最新，同时将自己的贡献推送到"origin"(这是一个分叉:您拥有的upstream回购的克隆).
The idea of upstream is to allow for your own repo to rebase itself on top of latest from upstream repo.
That way, you can keep up-to-date with upstream, while pushing your own contribution to 'origin' (which is a fork: a clone of upstream repo which you own).
您可以按origin键.您不能推送到upstream(您不是贡献者)
请参阅" 和upstream?"
You can push to origin. You can't push to upstream (you are not a contributor)
See "What is the difference between origin and upstream in GitHub?"
我建议您使用，因为upstream/master有其自己的历史记录(与您的更改平行)
In your case, I would recommend, since upstream/master has its own history (parallel to your changes)
git checkout rotation
git rebase upstream/master
git push -f origin rotation
请注意，您正在用力推动(即重新创建更改的历史记录)在叉子上origin/rotation:如果尚未从叉子上拉出其他贡献者，那么这应该不是问题.
您在rotation上的工作将基于最新的upstream/master，这将简化.
Note that you are force pushing (ie, recreating the history of your changes) on your fork origin/rotation: if no other contributor have already pulled from your fork, this shouldn't be an issue.
And your work on rotation will be based on the latest of upstream/master, which will simplify the future pull request you might want to do.
这篇关于Git分支转移问题和工作流程的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！