非虚拟和抽象方法的命名约定

问题描述

我经常发现自己创建使用这种形式（A）的类：

  abstract class Animal {
 public void Walk（）{
 // TODO：在执行之前执行某些操作
 
 //每个子类实现的自定义逻辑
 WalkInternal（）; 
 
 // TODO：行走后做一些
} 
 protected abstract void WalkInternal（）; 
} 
 
 class Dog：Animal {
 protected override void WalkInternal（）{
 // TODO：walk with 4 legs 
} 
 } 
 
 class Bird：Animal {
 protected override void WalkInternal（）{
 // TODO：walk with two legs 
} 
} 
  

而不是这种形式（B）：

 抽象类Animal {
 public abstract void Walk（）; 
} 
 
 class Dog：Animal {
 public override void Walk（）{
 // TODO：在走路前做点事
 
 / /每个子类实现的自定义逻辑
 // TODO：步行4条腿
 
 // TODO：在走路之后执行某些操作
} 
} 
 
 class Bird：Animal {
 public override void Walk（）{
 // TODO：执行某些操作之前
 
 //由每个子类实现的自定义逻辑
 // TODO：步行2条腿
 
 // TODO：走路后做点事
} 
} 
  

如您所见，表单A的好处是每次实现子类时，都不需要记住包含初始化和终止逻辑。这比窗体B更容易出错。

命名这些方法的标准惯例是什么？

我喜欢命名公共方法步行从那以后，我可以调用 Dog.Walk（），看起来比 Dog.WalkExternal（）。但是，我不喜欢我的解决方案为protected方法添加后缀Internal。我正在寻找一个更加标准化的名称。

Btw，这个设计模式有没有名字？

解决方案

我不知道是否有一个标准的命名约定。除了 WalkInternal ，其他替代方案可能是 DoWalk 或 WalkImpl 。

I frequently find myself creating classes which use this form (A):

abstract class Animal {
  public void Walk() {
    // TODO: do something before walking

    // custom logic implemented by each subclass
    WalkInternal();

    // TODO: do something after walking
  }
  protected abstract void WalkInternal();
}

class Dog : Animal {
  protected override void WalkInternal() {
    // TODO: walk with 4 legs
  }
}

class Bird : Animal {
  protected override void WalkInternal() {
    // TODO: walk with 2 legs
  }
}

Rather than this form (B):

abstract class Animal {
  public abstract void Walk();
}

class Dog : Animal {
  public override void Walk() {
    // TODO: do something before walking

    // custom logic implemented by each subclass
    // TODO: walk with 4 legs

    // TODO: do something after walking
  }
}

class Bird : Animal {
  public override void Walk() {
    // TODO: do something before walking

    // custom logic implemented by each subclass
    // TODO: walk with 2 legs

    // TODO: do something after walking
  }
}

As you can see, the nice thing about form A is that every time you implement a subclass, you don't need to remember to include the initialization and finalization logic. This is much less error prone than form B.

What's a standard convention for naming these methods?
I like naming the public method Walk since then I can call Dog.Walk() which looks better than something like Dog.WalkExternal(). However, I don't like my solution of adding the suffix "Internal" for the protected method. I'm looking for a more standardized name.

Btw, is there a name for this design pattern?

解决方案

I'm not sure if there is a standard naming convention for this. Besides WalkInternal, other alternatives might be DoWalk or WalkImpl.

这篇关于非虚拟和抽象方法的命名约定的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！