问题描述
我试图在gfortran下编译一些在g77下编译好的代码。这个问题似乎来自一个return语句:
ffuncs.f:934.13:
RETURN E
1
错误:在(1)需要一个SCALAR-INTEGER返回说明符
在代码中,任何东西E被指定为真实的* 8:
IMPLICIT REAL * 8(A - H,O - Z)
然而,E从来没有被赋予任何价值或事实上,直到返回语句才会看到它。我对fortran几乎一无所知。
谢谢。
您通常会调用这样的一个 SUBROUTINE
或 FUNCTION
标签作为参数,例如
<$ $'$ $ $'$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $'$'$ $ $ $'$'$'$'$' 2'
如果MYSUB中出现错误,则您执行 RETURN 1
或 RETURN 2
(而不是普通的RETURN),你可以在调用例程中直接跳到标签998或999。
这就是为什么通常你需要一个返回的整数 - 它不是一个值,而是一个你想要的错误出口的索引。
RETURN E
对我来说听起来不对。除非有一种我不知道的语法,否则以前的编译器应该将其标记为错误。
I'm trying to get some code compiled under gfortran that compiles fine under g77. The problem seems to be from a return statement:
ffuncs.f:934.13:
RETURN E
1
Error: Alternate RETURN statement at (1) requires a SCALAR-INTEGER return specifier
In the code anything E was specified as real*8:
IMPLICIT REAL*8 ( A - H , O -Z )
However, E was never given a value or anything in fact you never see it until the return statement. I know almost nothing about fortran. What is the meaning of a return statement with an argument in fortran?
Thanks.
In FORTRAN (up to Fortran 77, which I'm very familiar with), RETURN n
is not used to return a function value; instead, it does something like what in other languages would be handled by an exception: An exit to a code location other than the normal one.
You'd normally call such a SUBROUTINE
or FUNCTION
with labels as arguments, e.g.
CALL MYSUB(A, B, C, *998, *999)
...
998 STOP 'Error 1'
998 STOP 'Error 2'
and if things go wrong in MYSUB then you do RETURN 1
or RETURN 2
(rather than the normal RETURN) and you'd be hopping straight to label 998 or 999 in the calling routine.
That's why normally you want an integer on that RETURN - it's not a value but an index to which error exit you want to take.
RETURN E
sounds wrong to me. Unless there's a syntax I'm unaware of, the previous compiler should have flagged that as an error.
这篇关于Fortran返回语句的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!