问题描述
我可以安全地使用glm :: *类型（例如vec4，mat4）来填充顶点缓冲对象吗？
can I safely use the glm::* types (e.g. vec4, mat4) to fill a vertex buffer object ?
std::vector<glm::vec3> vertices;
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(glm::vec3) * vertices.size(), &vertices[0], GL_STATIC_DRAW);
我不太确定，因为struct padding（成员对齐）可能会在我的
I'm not quite sure about that since struct padding (member alignment) could cause some trouble in my opinion, though all compilers I've tested returns the expected sizes.
我正在开发C ++ 11编译器（也许这会产生影响）。
I'm developing for C++11 Compilers (maybe this make a difference).
推荐答案
定义安全。
因为他们认为合适。就ISO C ++而言，这个工作是否是依赖于实现的行为。
C++ gives implementations wide latitude to pad structures as they see fit. So as far as ISO C++ is concerned, whether this "works" is implementation-dependent behavior.
它将适用于桌面平台的许多编译器。我不能说ARM CPU，但一般来说， glm :: vec3 将有3个浮点数。但是，如果你想确认，你总是可以执行一个简单的 static_assert ：
It will work in general across a number of compilers for desktop platforms. I can't speak for ARM CPUs, but generally, glm::vec3 will be 3 floats in size. However, if you want to make sure, you can always perform a simple static_assert:
static_assert(sizeof(glm::vec3) == sizeof(GLfloat) * 3, "Platform doesn't support this directly.");
这篇关于C ++：OpenGL，glm和struct padding的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！