问题描述
我们目前将JMS API与ActiveMQ代理一起使用，希望移至RabbitMQ.与openWire和amqp相比，使用java client-producer可以提供最佳性能.我找不到关于amqp(RabbitMQ)与openwire(activeMQ)本机协议的比较研究.我正在寻找原始性能和易于扩展性.
We currently use JMS API with ActiveMQ broker, looking over to move to RabbitMQ.Compared to openWire vs amqp which one would give best performance with java client-producer. I Couldn't find a comparison study on amqp(RabbitMQ) vs openwire (activeMQ) native protocol. I'm looking in terms of raw performance and ease of scalability.
我们目前将Spring Integration用于ActiveMQ，我想知道即使使用Spring Integration迁移到RabbitMQ(AMQP)也是一次巨大的改变.是否有与ActiveMQ用于执行JMS AMQP转发的桥梁相似的桥梁?
We currently use Spring Integration for ActiveMQ, I would like to know if its a drastic change to move to RabbitMQ(AMQP) even with Spring Integration. Is there any bridge similar to what ActiveMQ uses to do JMS<->AMQP forwarding ?
推荐答案
ActiveMQ还支持AMQP: http://activemq.apache.org/amqp.html
ActiveMQ also supports AMQP: http://activemq.apache.org/amqp.html
两者都是二进制协议.使用ActiveMQ时，Openwire的功能将更加完善.
Both are binary protocols. Openwire is going to be more full-featured when using ActiveMQ.
对于原始性能"，您必须首先确定用例.从性能"的角度来看，您选择的协议(ampq与openwire)可能不会有任何不同.
For "raw performance" you'll have to nail down your use cases first. Chances are the protocol you choose (ampq vs openwire) is not going to make any difference from a "perfomance" standpoint.
这篇关于openwire vs amqp，效果会更好的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！