本文介绍了Julia JIT 编译、@time 和分配次数的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
I am just starting to evaluate Julia (version 0.6.0) and I tested how resize! and sizehint! could impact performance. I used @time macro.
Documentation says "# Run once to JIT-compile" but it seems that running once could not be enough if we check number of allocations.
module Test
function test(x::Int64; hint::Bool=false, resize::Bool=false)
A::Array{Int64} = []
n::Int64 = x
if resize
resize!(A, n)
for i in 1:n
A[i]=i
end
else
if hint sizehint!(A, n) end
for i in 1:n
push!(A, i)
end
end
A[end]
end
end
import Test
#Test.test(1); # (1)
#Test.test(1, hint=true); # (2)
#Test.test(1, resize=true); # (3)
@time Test.test(10_000_000)
@time Test.test(10_000_000, hint=true)
@time Test.test(10_000_000, resize=true)
I got different results for different "JIT-precompile" callings:
Result from code above:
0.494120 seconds (11.02 k allocations: 129.706 MiB, 22.77% gc time)
0.141155 seconds (3.43 k allocations: 76.537 MiB, 41.94% gc time)
0.068319 seconds (9 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 76.99% gc time)
If (1) is uncommented:
0.520939 seconds (112 allocations: 129.007 MiB, 21.79% gc time)
0.140845 seconds (3.43 k allocations: 76.537 MiB, 42.35% gc time)
0.068741 seconds (9 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 77.55% gc time)
if (1) && (2) are uncommented:
0.586479 seconds (112 allocations: 129.007 MiB, 19.28% gc time)
0.117521 seconds (9 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 50.56% gc time)
0.068275 seconds (9 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 76.84% gc time)
if (1) && (2) && (3) are uncommented:
0.509668 seconds (112 allocations: 129.007 MiB, 21.61% gc time)
0.112276 seconds (9 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 50.58% gc time)
0.065123 seconds (9 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 76.34% gc time)
if (3) is uncommented:
0.497802 seconds (240 allocations: 129.016 MiB, 22.53% gc time)
0.117035 seconds (11 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 52.56% gc time)
0.067170 seconds (11 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 76.93% gc time)
My questions:
- Is it bug?
- If it is not bug then is there possibility to invoke complete compilation?
解决方案
No, the doc here clearly tells this is due to you were running @time
in global scope:
julia> function foo()
Test.test(1) # warm-up
@time Test.test(10_000_000)
@time Test.test(10_000_000, hint=true)
@time Test.test(10_000_000, resize=true)
end
foo (generic function with 1 method)
julia> foo()
0.401256 seconds (26 allocations: 129.001 MiB, 47.38% gc time)
0.185094 seconds (6 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 37.13% gc time)
0.034649 seconds (6 allocations: 76.294 MiB, 30.99% gc time)
这篇关于Julia JIT 编译、@time 和分配次数的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!