问题描述
我在GNU GCC编译器中使用Code :: Blocks.我的问题是:有什么方法可以将c/c ++代码编译为ms-dos 16bit(.com)可执行格式?
我试图设置构建选项并在网上搜索编译器参数，但找不到任何东西.
I use Code::Blocks with GNU GCC Compiler.My question is: is there any way to compile c/c++ code to ms-dos 16bit (.com) executable format?
I tried to set the build options and search the compiler parameters on the net, but i couldn't find anything.
推荐答案
您当然可以将C和/或C ++(一种古老的方言)编译为16位MS-DOS .com文件.您使用Code :: Blocks拥有的编译器/链接器几乎可以肯定不能做到这一点.
You can certainly compile C and/or (an ancient dialect of) C++ to a 16-bit MS-DOS .com file. The compiler/linker you have with Code::Blocks almost certainly can't do that though.
尤其是，至少就我所知，gcc甚至从未尝试过为16位分段内存环境生成代码. gcc至少有一个端口连接到DOS扩展程序( DJGPP ，但它会生成.exe文件，不是.com，而是使用专有的DOS扩展程序以及古代版本的gcc).
In particular, at least to my knowledge, gcc has never even attempted to generate code for a 16-bit, segmented-memory environment. There was at least one port of gcc to a DOS extender (DJGPP, but it produces .exe files, not .com and it uses a proprietary DOS extender along with an ancient version of gcc).
如果确实需要生成.com文件，则有很多选择，但是所有编译器都相当老，因此，特别是对于C ++，它们接受的语言非常有限.
If you really need to generate a .com file, there are quite a few options, but all the compilers are quite old, so especially with respect to C++ the language they accept is quite limited.
- Microsoft:仅在相当短的时间内出售了用于MS-DOS的C ++编译器-它们进入市场的时间有些晚，然后转移到了相当早就只生成32位Windows可执行文件的编译器.除了语言一致性以外，优化方面的知识也更多.
- Borland:Microsoft的镜像.更好的一致性，较差的优化，可能是最后一个放弃MS-DOS市场的方法.他们最近的MS-DOS编译器甚至支持C ++模板(当时还很新).
- Watcom:仍可免费下载的其中之一，但没有商业支持.当它是新产品时，通常被认为是最佳的一致性和优化工具之一.
- 元软件:当时相当昂贵的选择.我从未使用过它，但是我尊敬的一些人高度认为它是您可以获得的最佳编译器.主要针对嵌入式系统.
- Datalight/Zortech/Symantec/Digital Mars:另一个仍正式可用的.有少量但非常忠诚的追随者.我试了一段时间，但没有找到一个令人信服的理由来使它比其他人更喜欢.
- Microsoft: Only sold C++ compilers for MS-DOS for a fairly short time--they were somewhat late into the market, and moved out of it to compilers that produced only 32-bit Windows executables fairly early. Known more for optimization than language conformance.
- Borland: Mirror image of Microsoft. Better conformance, poorer optimization, probably the last to abandon the MS-DOS market. Their last few compilers for MS-DOS even supported C++ templates (fairly new at the time).
- Watcom: one of the few that's still available as a free download, but without commercial support. When it was new, this was generally considered one of the best available for both conformance and optimization.
- Metaware: Quite an expensive option at the time. I never used it, but some people I respected highly considered it the best compiler you could get. Mostly targeted embedded systems.
- Datalight/Zortech/Symantec/Digital Mars: the other one that's still officially available. Had a small but extremely loyal following. I tried it for a while, but never found a compelling reason to prefer it to others.
那时也还有很多，但是这些可能在当时占据了90％以上的市场.
There were quite a few more back then as well, but these probably account for well over 90% of the market at the time.
这篇关于如何将c/c ++编译为ms-dos .com程序?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！