问题描述
.NET Core 允许 从配置文件中延迟读取设置,将其反序列化为 POCO 并使用一行代码在内置 DI 容器中注册该 POCO:
.NET Core allows to lazily read settings from configuration file, de-serialize it to a POCO and register that POCO in built-in DI container with one line of code:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.Configure<MyOptions>(Configuration.GetSection("MySection"));
}
然后任何消费者都可以解析 IOptions
以访问该 POCO:
Then any consumer can resolve IOptions<MyOptions>
to access that POCO:
public HomeController(IOptions<MyOptions> optionsAccessor)
{
MyOptions options = optionsAccessor.Value;
}
这种方法有明显的缺点:
This approach has the significant disadvantages:
来自
Microsoft.Extensions.Options
包的不必要的依赖:
模拟、测试和显式实例创建变得更加冗长.
Mocking, testing and explicit instance creation become a bit more verbose.
在没有 IOptions
的情况下解析选项的最简单解决方案是什么?
What is the easiest solution to resolve options without IOptions<T>
?
推荐答案
Deserialize options with configuration.Get
或 configuration.Bind
调用并注册一个 POCODI 容器显式为单例:
Deserialize options with configuration.Get<TOptions>
or configuration.Bind
call and register a POCO in DI container explicitly as singleton:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddSingletonFromFile<MyOptions>(Configuration.GetSection("MySection"));
}
//...
public static IServiceCollection AddSingletonFromFile<TOptions>(
this IServiceCollection services,
IConfiguration configuration)
where TOptions : class, new()
{
//POCO is created with actual values
TOptions options = configuration.Get<TOptions>();
services.AddSingleton(options);
return services;
}
UPD:感谢@NPNelson 的 .Get<TOptions>()
提示.
UPD: thanks to @NPNelson for .Get<TOptions>()
hint.
那么IOptions
就不再需要解析了,类的依赖就变得清晰了:
Then IOptions<T>
resolving is no longer needed, and the class dependencies become clear:
public HomeController(MyOptions options)
{
_options = options;
}
仅供参考:也可以通过这种方式从外部服务(数据库等)读取:
FYI: reading from an external service (database etc.) is also possible this way:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddTransientFromService<OptionsReader, MyOptions>(reader => reader.GetOptions());
}
//...
public static void AddTransientFromService<TReader, TOptions>(
this IServiceCollection services,
Func<TReader, TOptions> getOptions)
where TReader : class
where TOptions : class
{
services.AddTransient(provider => getOptions(provider.GetService<TReader>()));
}
备注:
- Singleton 并不懒惰(它总是在启动时实例化);
- 在单例注册的情况下,任何在运行时更新选项的能力都将丢失(.NET Core 本身支持使用
reloadOnChange
选项设置重新加载运行时文件:.AddJsonFile("appsettings.json", false, reloadOnChange: true)
);
- Singleton is not lazy (it's always instantiated at startup);
- In case of singleton registration, any ability to update options at runtime is lost (.NET Core natively supports runtime file reloading with
reloadOnChange
option setup:.AddJsonFile("appsettings.json", false, reloadOnChange: true)
);
如果您确实需要重新加载文件并且您仍然不想使用IOptions
,请考虑暂时解析.当然,按请求解析会导致性能显着下降.
If you really need the file reload and you still don't want to use IOptions
, consider a transient resolving. Of course, per-request resolving can lead to the significant perfomance decrease.
这篇关于读取和使用 appsettings.json 中的设置而无需 IOptions<T>?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!