从另一个SQL Server几何中减去

问题描述

有没有办法从另一个几何体中减去几何体？一种反向STUnion ..

我遇到的问题是我需要确保一个形状适合另一个（不更改较大的形状）。我想我可以使用STIntersection来获得in中的形状。然而，STIntersection并不准确，并且会产生一种可以（并且不）等同于真实交集的形状。

如果您随后采用原始形状的STD差异，则可以轻松地看到这一点。

所以，我想要做的是给两个形状，我想从另一个中减去一个 - 例如

任何想法？

编辑：现在，我已经从STBuffer（-1）版本的更大形状创建了我的交集，这应该解释STIntersection的数学变化，精度略有降低。然而，我仍然很想知道你是否可以从另一个几何体中减去几何体。 .STDifference（ ） 。不需要先交叉，然后减去交点。直接减去。

Is there a way to subtract a geometry from another? A kind of reverse STUnion..

The problem I am having is that I need to ensure a shape fits within another (without changing the larger shape). I thought I could use the STIntersection to get the shape thats "in". However, STIntersection is not accurate and produces a shape that can (and does) not equate to the true intersection.

You can easily see this if you then take the STDifference of the original shape.

So , what I would like to do is given two shapes I want to subtract one from the other - e.g. Take the STIntersection and then subtract the STDifference.

Any ideas?

Edit: For now, I have created my intersection from a STBuffer(-1) version of the bigger shape, this should account the mathematical variation of STIntersection with a slight reduction in accuracy. However, I would still love to know if you can subtract a geometry from another..

解决方案

Just use .STDifference(). No need to intersect first, then subtract the intersection. Just subtract directly.

这篇关于从另一个SQL Server几何中减去的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！