C#中的锁语句

问题描述

例如，我上过这样的课:

Ex, i''ve a class like this:

public class myclass
{
      private Object x;
      public void method1()
      {
          lock(x)
          {
                //access to x from thread1
          }
      }
      
      public void method2()
      {
             //access to x from thread2
      }
}

现在，如果从线程调用method1()(但尚未完成).然后从另一个线程调用method2()(method1()尚未从线程thread1完成).线程2是否必须等到method1()完成?

Now, if method1() is called from a thread(but not completed yet). And method2() is called from an another thread(method1() hasn''t completed yet from thread thread1). Will thread2 have to wait until method1() completed?

推荐答案

public class myclass
{
      private Object x;
      public void method1()
      {
          lock(x)
          {
                //access to x from thread1
          }
      }

      public void method2()
      {
          lock(x)
          {
                //access to x from thread2
          }
      }
}

问候，

-MRB

Regards,

-MRB

public void method1()
{
    lock(x)
    {
          //access to x from thread1
    }
}

public void method2()
{
    lock(x)
    {
        ...
    }
}

-------------------------------

但是，我的问题是，如果method2()没有锁语句，它将不得不等待吗?

如果method2中没有锁，它将不会等待.
现在关于是否放置锁，这取决于您在method1和method2中执行的操作.
如果将锁放在method1中以保护几个成员，并且访问method2中的相同成员，则可能还必须在method2中使用锁.
如果您做的非常不同，则无需锁定method2.

-------------------------------

But, my question is that if method2() hasn''t got a lock statement, will it have to wait?

If there is no lock in method2, it will not wait.
Now about puting a lock or not, it depends what you do in method1 and method2.
If you put the lock in method1 to protect a few members, and you access the same members in method2, then you will probably have to use a lock in method2 too.
If you do something very different, then you don''t need to lock in method2.

这篇关于C#中的锁语句的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！