问题描述
此问题是.
那里接受的答案建议使用:
The accepted answer there suggests to use:
MATCH
(i:Interface {name:'Action'} )<-[:IMPLEMENTS|EXTENDS*1..10]- (class),
(abstractAction:Class {name:'AbstractAction'})
where not (class)-->(abstractAction)
RETURN class
效果很好,并给出了符合该条件的类的列表.
That works nicely, and gives a list of classes matching that condition.
我唯一的问题是:接口Action
的名称是(惊奇)含糊的.绝对的类名称com.whatever.foo.bar.Action
将是.但是,当我更改查询以使用{name:'com.whatever.foo.bar.Action'}
时,得到的结果为空.
The only problem I have: the name of that interface Action
is (surprise) ambiguous. The absolute class name com.whatever.foo.bar.Action
would be. But when I change the query to use {name:'com.whatever.foo.bar.Action'}
I get an empty result.
然后我尝试了{package:'com.whatever.foo.bar' name:'Action'}
,但这不起作用:
I then tried {package:'com.whatever.foo.bar' name:'Action'}
, but that doesn't work:
有没有一种方法可以将搜索结果减少到我真正关心的 操作界面?
Is there a way reduce the search result to that Action interface I really care about?
推荐答案
有一个fqn
节点属性-完全限定名称.
There is a fqn
node property - full qualified name.
因此正确的查询应为:
MATCH
(i:Interface {fqn:'com.whatever.foo.bar.Action'} )<-[:IMPLEMENTS|EXTENDS*1..10]- (class),
(abstractAction:Class {fqn:'com.whatever.foo.bar.AbstractAction'})
where not (class)-->(abstractAction)
RETURN class
此查询产生笛卡尔乘积,这意味着它的性能不是很高.
This query produces a cartesian produckt which means that it's not very performant.
下图显示了针对我的一个项目的查询的执行计划:
The following image shows the execution plan of that query for one of my projects:
此问题更详细地解决了该问题:
This questions deals with that problem in more detail: Why does neo4j warn: "This query builds a cartesian product between disconnected patterns"?
由于此查询仅用于分析目的,而不是针对生产系统执行,因此我将忽略该提示.
Since this query is just for analysis purposes and not executed against a production system, I would ignore that hint.
这篇关于如何将包包含在查询中?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!