使用C ++共享指针的别名构造函数和空的共享指针

问题描述

std :: shared_ptr具有一个别名构造函数，该函数允许新创建的shared_ptr与现有的共享指针共享状态，同时指向其他对象.

std::shared_ptr has an aliasing constructor that allows newly created shared_ptr to share state with an existing shared pointer while pointing to some other object.

我当时正在考虑滥用此构造函数，以将指向全局对象的指针放置在shared_ptr中:

I was thinking about abusing this constructor to put pointer to some global object inside shared_ptr:

int global = 0;

int main()
{
    // because we point to global object we do not need to track its lifetime
    // so we use empty shared_ptr<void> as a provider of shared state
    std::shared_ptr<int> p(std::shared_ptr<void>(), &global);
    std::shared_ptr<int> pp = p;
    return *pp;
}

我的问题是:合法吗?该代码可在主要编译器上成功运行.

My question is: Is it legal? The code successfully works on major compilers.

请注意，我不问这是否是一件好事.我确实知道，有一种使用无操作删除器将指向全局对象的指针放入shared_ptr中的规范方法.如果合法，这也有点令人不安，因为有可能具有可取消引用的shared_ptr，弱指针始终过期:

Note, that I do not ask if it's a good thing to do. I do understand that there's a canonical way of putting pointers to global objects into shared_ptr using no-op deleter. It is also a bit disturbing if it is legal, because it would be possible to have dereferenceable shared_ptr, weak pointers to which are always expired:

    std::shared_ptr<int> p(std::shared_ptr<void>(), &global);
    std::weak_ptr<int> w = p;
    if (p) // p is alive and well
    {      // and w is not
        *w.lock(); // and here program crashes
    }

推荐答案

众所周知，在当前解决方案中，p的use_count()为零，这就是weak_ptr过期的原因.根据C ++草案N4296，这似乎可以:

As you already know, with your current solution, p has a use_count() of zero, that's why the weak_ptr is expired. This seems to be ok, according to the C++ draft N4296:

20.8.2.2.2 shared_ptr析构函数[util.smartptr.shared.dest]
〜shared_ptr();
1种效果:
(1.1)— 如果*此为空或与另一个shared_ptr实例(use_count()> 1)共享所有权， 没有副作用.
(1.2)—否则，如果*这拥有一个对象p和一个删除器d，则调用d(p).
(1.3)—否则，*这拥有一个指针p，而删除p称为

20.8.2.2.2 shared_ptr destructor [util.smartptr.shared.dest]
~shared_ptr();
1 Effects:
(1.1) — If *this is empty or shares ownership with another shared_ptr instance (use_count() > 1), there are no side effects.
(1.2) — Otherwise, if *this owns an object p and a deleter d, d(p) is called.
(1.3) — Otherwise, *this owns a pointer p, and delete p is called

强调我的.
您可以使用以下代码代替，该代码给出shared_ptr且use_count()为1:

emphasis mine.
You could use the following instead which gives a shared_ptr with a use_count() of one:

std::shared_ptr<int> p(&global, [](int*){});

这使用一个空的自定义删除器.

This uses an empty custom deleter.

这篇关于使用C ++共享指针的别名构造函数和空的共享指针的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！