Angular 2/TypeScript:@输入/@输出还是输入/输出?

问题描述

在进行有关Udemy的课程时，我们一直允许使用组件类中的@Input()装饰器将组件传递给数据dy.

While doing a course on Udemy we have been allowing components to be passed data dy using the @Input() decorator in the component class.

在阅读ngBook-2时，我发现有另一种方法是在@Component装饰器中使用input属性.

While reading through ngBook-2 I have found that there is another approach by using the input property inside an @Component decorator.

THIS 类似的问题在SO上，一个人回答:

THIS similar question on SO, One person answered:

并仔细阅读文档指出:

真的，关于这方面最有用的信息主要取决于您的外观.

Really, the most useful information about this is mostly conflicting depending on where you look.

内部@Component

 @Component({
  selector: 'product-image',
  inputs: ['product'],
  template: `
  <img class="product-image" [src]="product.imageUrl">
})

class ProductImage {
  product: Product;
}

内部课程

@Component({
  selector: 'product-image',
  template: `
  <img class="product-image" [src]="product.imageUrl">
})

class ProductImage {
  @Input() product: Product;
}

我想知道的事情

• 哪种最佳实践"用法更合适?
• 您何时会使用另一个?
• 有什么区别吗?

推荐答案

Angular 2样式指南

根据官方 Angular 2样式指南，样式05-12 说

好处是(根据指南):

• 识别类中的哪些属性是输入或输出更容易且更具可读性.
• 如果您需要重命名与@Input或@Output关联的属性或事件名称，则可以在单个位置进行修改.
• 该指令所附的元数据声明更短，因此更具可读性.
• 将装饰器放在同一行上可以缩短代码长度，并且仍然可以轻松地将该属性标识为输入或输出.

• It is easier and more readable to identify which properties in a class are inputs or outputs.
• If you ever need to rename the property or event name associated with @Input or @Output, you can modify it a single place.
• The metadata declaration attached to the directive is shorter and thus more readable.
• Placing the decorator on the same line makes for shorter code and still easily identifies the property as an input or output.

我亲自使用了这种样式，并且非常感谢它有助于使代码保持 DRY .

I've personally used this style and really appreciate it helping keep the code DRY.

这篇关于Angular 2/TypeScript:@输入/@输出还是输入/输出?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！