问题描述
在实现IDisposable时，我理解在处置对象后不应调用的每个方法都应抛出 ObjectDisposedException 。但是应该传递给异常的构造函数的名称对象的标准是什么？
When implementing IDisposable, I undertand that every method that shouldn't be called after the object's been disposed should throw the ObjectDisposedException. But what is the standard for the name object that should be passed to the exception's constructor?
推荐答案
我相信推荐的做法是抛出以下内容：
I believe the recommended practice is to throw the following:
throw new ObjectDisposedException(GetType().FullName);
或者包括支票在内，这两种代码行都在每种需要它的方法的顶部（显然而不是 Dispose 方法本身）：
Or including the check, these two lines of code at the top of each method that needs it (obviously not the Dispose method itself):
if (this.disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException(GetType().FullName);
甚至可能有助于将其重构为一种微小的可用性方法。
Might even be helpful to refactor this into a tiny method for usability.
这篇关于抛出ObjectDisposedException时应以什么作为objectName传递？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！