问题描述
我正在尝试从boost :: spirit规则定义的操作中引用一个(尚未)未知实例的成员,所以在伪代码中,
I'm trying to reference a member of a (yet) unknown instance from within a boost::spirit rule definitions' action, so in pseudocode,
而不是 double_ [ref(rN)= _1]我正在寻找类似的东西 X ** ppx; double_ [ref(& X :: rN,ppx)= _1]
instead of double_[ref(rN) = _1]I'm looking for something like X** ppx; double_[ref(&X::rN, ppx) = _1]
一种解决方法可能是一个简单的语义动作",其中包含一个知道实例并能够写入实例的参数,例如
A workaround for it could be a simple "semantic action" with a parameter which knows the instance and would be able to write to it, like
qi::rule<Iterator, Skipper> start;
my_grammar(DataContext*& dataContext) : my_grammar::base_type(start) , execContext(execContext) {
start = qi::double_[ boost::bind(&my_grammar::newValueForXY, dataContext, ::_1) ];
但是,我想知道是否有可能直接绑定"到成员变量,就像可以通过使用"phoenix :: ref(...)= value"绑定到局部"变量一样.
However, I'm wondering if there is a possibility to "bind" directly to the member variable like it's possible to bind to a "local" variable by using "phoenix::ref(...) = value".
我尝试了以下语法:
start = qi::int_[ boost::bind<int&>(&DataContext::newValueForXY, boost::ref(dataContext))() = ::_1] ];
但由于VS2010SP1和错误消息而失败
but failed with VS2010SP1 and the error message
错误C2440:'=':'boost :: arg'无法转换为...
error C2440: '=': 'boost::arg' cannot be converted into ...
推荐答案
有几种方法可以给这只猫换皮:
There are several ways to skin this cat:
- 您可能想到了延迟 bind表达式的执行:
phx::bind
可以做到 - 或者,您可以仅使用属性传播(并且完全不使用语义动作)
- 最后,您可以使用继承的属性(例如,当DataContext没有默认构造函数或复制昂贵时)
- you probably thought of deferring execution of the bind expression:
phx::bind
can do that - alternatively, you could just use attribute propagation for that (and do without semantic actions altogether)
- lastly, you could use inherited attributes (e.g. when the DataContext has no default constructor or copying is expensive)
1.延迟与Phoenix的绑定
为此目的使用凤凰绑定:这将导致Phoenix演员在触发语义动作时被推迟执行".
1. Deferring the Bind with Phoenix
Use phoenix bind for the purpose: this will result in a Phoenix actor, that will be "deferred executed" at the time the semantic action is triggered.
这是您可能想要的缺少代码示例的重构:
Here's a reconstruction of the missing code sample you might have been after:
#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix.hpp>
namespace qi = boost::spirit::qi;
namespace phx= boost::phoenix;
struct DataContext
{
double xy;
};
template <typename Iterator, typename Skipper>
struct my_grammar : qi::grammar<Iterator, Skipper>
{
my_grammar(DataContext& dataContext) : my_grammar::base_type(start)
{
start = qi::double_
[ phx::bind(&my_grammar::newValueForXY,
phx::ref(dataContext),
qi::_1) ];
}
private:
static void newValueForXY(DataContext& dc, double value)
{
dc.xy = value;
}
qi::rule<Iterator, Skipper> start;
};
int main()
{
const std::string s = "3.14";
DataContext ctx;
my_grammar<decltype(begin(s)), qi::space_type> p(ctx);
auto f(begin(s)), l(end(s));
if (qi::phrase_parse(f, l, p, qi::space))
std::cout << "Success: " << ctx.xy << "\n";
}
注意:
- phx :: ref()将引用包装到数据上下文
- qi :: _ 1而不是boost :: _ 1作为占位符
-
使用
newValueForXY
的这种实现,您可以很容易地编写
- phx::ref() to wrap the reference to the datacontext
- qi::_1 instead of boost::_1 as a placeholder
given this implementation of
newValueForXY
you could just as easily have written
start = qi::double_
[ phx::bind(&DataContext::xy, phx::ref(dataContext)) = qi::_1 ];
但是,我可能会使用属性而不是语义动作来编写相同的示例(因为这基本上就是它们的用途):
However, I'd probably write the same example using attributes instead of semantic actions (because that's basically what they are for):
#include <boost/fusion/adapted/struct.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix.hpp>
namespace qi = boost::spirit::qi;
namespace phx= boost::phoenix;
struct DataContext {
double xy;
};
BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT(DataContext, (double, xy))
template <typename Iterator, typename Skipper>
struct my_grammar : qi::grammar<Iterator, DataContext(), Skipper>
{
my_grammar() : my_grammar::base_type(start) {
start = qi::double_;
}
private:
qi::rule<Iterator, DataContext(), Skipper> start;
};
int main()
{
const std::string s = "3.14";
static const my_grammar<decltype(begin(s)), qi::space_type> p;
DataContext ctx;
if (qi::phrase_parse(begin(s), end(s), p, qi::space, ctx))
std::cout << "Success: " << ctx.xy << "\n";
}
3.使用继承的属性来传递上下文引用
如果您绝对坚持,甚至可以出于以下目的使用 inherited attributes
:
3. Use inherited attributes to pass in the context reference
If you absolutely insist, you can even use inherited attributes
for the purpose:
#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix.hpp>
namespace qi = boost::spirit::qi;
namespace phx= boost::phoenix;
struct DataContext {
double xy;
};
template <typename Iterator, typename Skipper>
struct my_grammar : qi::grammar<Iterator, void(DataContext&), Skipper> {
my_grammar() : my_grammar::base_type(start)
{
start = qi::double_ [ phx::bind(&DataContext::xy, qi::_r1) = qi::_1 ];
}
qi::rule<Iterator, void(DataContext&), Skipper> start;
};
int main() {
const std::string s = "3.14";
const static my_grammar<std::string::const_iterator, qi::space_type> p;
DataContext ctx;
if(qi::phrase_parse(begin(s), end(s), p(phx::ref(ctx)), qi::space)) {
std::cout << "Success: " << ctx.xy << "\n";
}
}
这在呼叫站点上更具表现力:
This is somewhat more expressive at the call site:
qi::phrase_parse(begin(s), end(s), p(phx::ref(ctx)), qi::space));
,并且不需要上下文是默认可构造的.
and doesn't require the context to be default constructible.
这篇关于是否可以将动作附加到boost :: spirit :: rule解析器,该解析器将解析的结果分配给(尚未)未知实例的成员?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!