本文介绍了不会调用方法上的Sinon.spy的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在测试的代码非常简单:如果条件被验证,它将调用一个方法.如果没有,它将调用第一个方法中包含的另一个方法作为属性.

The code I'm testing is fairly simple: it invokes a method in case a condition is verified. If not, it invokes another method contained within the first one as an attribute.

app.js:

function test (fn, isActivated) {
  if (isActivated) {
    return fn('foo')
  }

  return fn.subFn('bar')
}

var fn = function (p) { return p }
fn.subFn = function (p) { return 'sub-' + p }

var resFn = test(fn, true)
var resSubFn = test(fn, false)

document.write(resFn) // shows 'foo' as expected
document.write(resSubFn) // shows 'bar' as expected

我对每种方法都设置了一个间谍,但是当包含的方法subFn上的间谍起作用时,fn方法上的间谍似乎不起作用.参见下文:

I've set a spy on each method but the spy on the fn method does not seem to work while the spy on the contained method subFn works. See below:

app.test.js:

'use strict'

const chai = require('chai')
const sinon = require('sinon')
const trigger = require('../app').trigger

chai.should()

describe('test app', function () {
    before(function () {
      this.fn = function () {}
      this.fn.subFn = function () {}
      this.subFnSpy = sinon.spy(this.fn, 'subFn')
      this.fnSpy = sinon.spy(this.fn)
    })

    describe('isActivated is true', function () {
      before(function () {
        trigger(this.fn, true)
      })

      it('should invoke fn', function () {
        this.fnSpy.callCount.should.equal(1) // return false because callCount = 0
      })
    })

    describe('isActivated is false', function () {
      before(function () {
        trigger(this.fn, false)
      })

      it('should invoke subFn', function () {
        this.subFnSpy.callCount.should.equal(1) // return false because callCount = 0
      })
    })
  })

闻到fn函数的间谍有什么问题,我尝试了两种单独的方法.在这种情况下,两个间谍都将失败:

Smelling something wrong with the spy on the fn function, I've tried with two separate methods. Both spies fail in this case:

app.js:

exports.trigger = function (fn, subFn, isActivated) {
  if (isActivated) {
    return fn('fn')
  }

  return subFn('bar')
}

app.test.js

'use strict'

const chai = require('chai')
const sinon = require('sinon')
const trigger = require('../app').trigger

chai.should()

describe('test app', function () {
    before(function () {
      this.fn = function () {}
      this.subFn = function () {}
      this.fnSpy = sinon.spy(this.fn)
      this.subFnSpy = sinon.spy(this.subFn)
    })

    beforeEach(function () {
      this.fnSpy.reset()
      this.subFnSpy.reset()
    })

    describe('isActivated is true', function () {
      before(function () {
        trigger(this.fn, this.subFn, true)
      })

      it('should invoke fn if isActivated is true', function () {
        this.fnSpy.callCount.should.equal(1) // return false
      })
    })

    describe('isActivated is false', function () {
      before(function () {
        trigger(this.fn, this.subFn, false)
      })

      it('should invoke subFn if isActivated is true', function () {
        this.subFnSpy.callCount.should.equal(1) // return false
      })
    })
  })

关于我在做什么错的任何建议吗?

Any suggestion of what I'm doing wrong?

推荐答案

我没有找到确切的解决方案,但一种解决方法与之非常接近.因此,问题似乎在于用sinon.spy处理this.fn的方式,而不是这样做:

I did not find the exact solution but a workaround quite close from one. So the problem seems to lie with the way this.fn is handled withtin sinon.spy, thus instead of doing:

this.fnSpy = sinon.spy(this.fn)
this.subFnSpy = sinon.spy(this.subFn)

我们执行以下操作:

this.fnSpy = sinon.spy(this, 'fn')
this.subFnSpy = sinon.spy(this.fn, 'subFn')

我使用this来存储fnsubFn的事实使这种情况减轻了.

The is easd by the fact that I use this to store fn and subFn.

这篇关于不会调用方法上的Sinon.spy的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

08-15 22:27