问题描述
据其主页，在 SemWeb 库（伟大的处理RDF库在.NET）是在GPL下发布的。由于 ROWLEX 工具是建立在SemWeb，ROWLEX应该是GPL，太。尽管如此，ROWLEX声称在L-GPL发布。这是法律上正确的？
According to its homepage, the SemWeb library (great library for handling RDF under .NET) is released under GPL. Since the ROWLEX tool is built on SemWeb, ROWLEX supposed to be GPL, too. Still, ROWLEX is claimed to be released under L-GPL.Is this legally correct?
推荐答案
其实，你的说法是不完全准确。 SemWeb 不仅是GPL的，但双许可。该人士$ C $ C写的约书亚Tauberer也受知识共享署名许可授权。由于 ROWLEX 仅在code约书亚写的依赖，创意共同署名许可证允许ROWLEX根据L-GPL进行分配。
Actually, your statement is not completely accurate. SemWeb is not just GPL but dual-licensed. The source code written by Joshua Tauberer is also licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license. Since ROWLEX relies solely on the code Joshua wrote, the Creative Common Attribution license permits ROWLEX to be distributed under L-GPL.
这篇关于如何ROWLEX将在L-GPL许可，而它使用SemWeb这是GPL？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！