问题描述
您使用(竞争框架)有什么经验?
What is your experience working with Websync (comet framework)? Have you considered any alternatives before using it?
到目前为止,我可以说
优点:
- 非常简单易用
- 不需要任何服务器配置
缺点:
- 价格昂贵(事实证明,这样做可以节省大量资金)带宽,所以不够)
- 缺少文档(WebSync3仍然很少,但是文档非常好而且很全面)
- JavaScript框架不够灵活(事实证明是足够灵活的,尽管花了一些时间来完成WebSync2所需的所有操作,但最终发现它成为WebSync3中的典型使用场景之一(身份验证等)
结论:
该框架非常简单,灵活,允许我们以作者从未使用过的方式使用它想到了;)
Conclusion:The framework is amazingly straightforward and flexible, and allowed us to use it in ways that authors never even thought of ;)
至于价格:事实证明,完全值得花这笔钱。
As for the price: it turned out to be totally worth the money. Plus the support is just beyond awesome.
推荐答案
我将它留给其他人发表对使用WebSync的想法,但我认为我至少会尝试解决缺点;)
I'll leave it to someone else to post their thoughts on their use of WebSync, but I figured I'd at least attempt to address the cons ;)
1)当然,相对于开源解决方案。但是,恕我直言,您要支付的前期费用是由于易用性和实施时间而容易弥补的:)。我认为您不会找到实现起来更快或更简单的彗星解决方案。相对于其他封闭源解决方案,我们非常便宜。其他一些彗星解决方案要获得20k +的许可费用,并且需要订阅支持。
1) Relative to open source solutions, sure. But, what you pay in up front costs, IMHO, you'll easily make up for due to ease of use and time of implementation :). I don't think you'll find a comet solution that's faster or simpler to implement. Relative to other closed-source solutions, we're pretty darn cheap; some other comet solutions run 20k+ for a license and require support subscriptions.
2)是的,我知道一个。示例和文档涵盖了基础知识,足以构成一个不错的应用程序,但对于更高级的场景等而言,它并没有涉及足够的细节。我们正在努力对其进行升级。
2) Yeah, I know that one. The examples and documentation cover the basics, and it's enough to pull together a decent app, but doesn't go into enough detail for more advanced scenarios, etc. We're working on upgrading it.
3)我很想知道您想在javascript框架中看到什么额外的灵活性;您是否在寻找特别的东西?在评论中添加注释!
3) I'd love to know what additional flexibility you'd like to see in the javascript framework; was there something in particular you were looking for? Drop a note in the comments!
这篇关于Websync:利弊?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!