问题描述
ApplicationController
before_filter:check_stuff,:if => proc {Rails.env.production?}
end
在最近的代码审查期间,我被问及是否需要 proc
。答案似乎是是,但这是一个合理的问题,我打算通过参考Rails文档或指南或使用条件符号与 before_filter
(现在是 before_action
的别名)。
我找不到任何内容。有没有描述这种用法的(当前和官方)指南或文档? 提到:仅
/ :除了
,但不是:如果
/ :除非
。
没有这个,代码中有什么地方可以指出这一点吗?简要介绍,但这更多关于如何:只有
和:除了
,而不是:if
或:除非
。
在Rails指南中找到:
发现一个 Proc
并不总是需要它工作。
所以在你的情况下,你可能会摆脱
before_action:check_stuff,if: Rails.env.production?
有时在Rails文档中查找内容可能会很痛苦,但至少这样的问题会使事情变得更容易随着时间的推移,StackOverflow被很好地编入索引并具有很高的搜索排名。
Behold, a before_filter
:
class ThingController < ApplicationController
before_filter :check_stuff, :if => proc {Rails.env.production?}
end
During a recent code review, I was asked whether the proc
is required for this to work. The answer appears to be 'yes', but it's a reasonable question, and I had intended to answer it by referring to the Rails docs or guides or something on the use of conditionals with before_filter
(now an alias of before_action
).
I couldn't find any. Is there a (current and official) guide or documentation that describes this usage? The Action Controller Guide mentions :only
/:except
, but not :if
/:unless
.
Failing that, is there somewhere in the code I can point to that covers this? It's mentioned briefly here, but that's more about how :only
and :except
are handled, rather than :if
or :unless
.
Found it on Rails Guides: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_callbacks.html#conditional-callbacks
Turns out a Proc
isn't always required for it to work.
So in your case you could probably get away with
before_action :check_stuff, if: "Rails.env.production?"
Finding things in Rails documentation can be a pain sometimes, but at least questions like this make things easier to find over time since StackOverflow is well indexed and has high search rankings.
这篇关于有条件的before_action / before_filter的文档的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!