问题描述
我需要将我的 cloudwatch 日志发送到日志分析服务.
I need to ship my cloudwatch logs to a log analysis service.
我已经关注了这些文章 这里 和 here 并手动操作,不用担心.
I've followed along with these articles here and here and got it working by hand, no worries.
现在我正在尝试使用 Terraform 自动化所有这些(角色/策略、安全组、cloudwatch 日志组、lambda 以及从日志组触发 lambda).
Now I'm trying to automate all this with Terraform (roles/policies, security groups, cloudwatch log group, lambda, and triggering the lambda from the log group).
但我不知道如何使用 TF 来配置 AWS 以从 cloudwatch 日志中触发 lambda.
But I can't figure out how to use TF to configure AWS to trigger the lambda from the cloudwatch logs.
我可以通过执行以下操作(在 Lambda Web 控制台 UI 中)手动将两个 TF 资源链接在一起:
I can link the two TF resources together by hand by doing the following (in the Lambda web console UI):
- 进入 lambda 函数的触发器"部分
- 点击添加触发器"
- 从触发器类型列表中选择cloudwatch 日志"
- 选择我要触发 lambda 的日志组
- 输入过滤器名称
- 将过滤器模式留空(意味着在所有日志流上触发)
- 确保选中启用触发器"
- 点击提交按钮
完成后,lambda 将显示在 cloudwatch 日志控制台的订阅列中 - 显示为Lambda (cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda)".
Once that's done, the lambda shows up on the cloudwatch logs console in the subscriptions column - displays as "Lambda (cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda)".
我尝试使用以下 TF 资源创建订阅:
I tried to create the subscription with the following TF resource:
resource "aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter" "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-subscription" {
name = "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-subscription"
role_arn = "${aws_iam_role.jordi-waf-cloudwatch-lambda-role.arn}"
log_group_name = "${aws_cloudwatch_log_group.jordi-waf-int-app-loggroup.name}"
filter_pattern = "logtype test"
destination_arn = "${aws_lambda_function.cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda.arn}"
}
但它失败了:
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-subscription:InvalidParameterException:vendor lambda 的destinationArn 不能与roleArn 一起使用
我发现 this answer关于为预定事件设置类似的东西,但这似乎并不等同于我上面描述的控制台操作(控制台 UI 方法不会创建一个事件/规则我可以看到).
I found this answer about setting up a similar thing for a scheduled event, but that doesn't seem to be equivalent to what the console actions I described above do (the console UI method doesn't create an event/rule that I can see).
谁能给我指点一下我做错了什么?
Can someone give me a pointer on what I'm doing wrong please?
推荐答案
我的 aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter
资源定义不正确 - 在这种情况下您不应该提供 role_arn
参数.
I had the aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter
resource defined incorrectly - you should not provide the role_arn
argument in this situation.
您还需要添加 aws_lambda_permission
资源(在过滤器上定义 depends_on
关系,否则 TF 可能会以错误的顺序执行此操作).
You also need to add an aws_lambda_permission
resource (with a depends_on
relationship defined on the filter or TF may do it in the wrong order).
请注意,AWS lambda 控制台 UI 会以不可见的方式为您添加 lambda 权限,因此请注意,如果您之前碰巧在控制台 UI 中执行过相同的操作,则 aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter
将在没有权限资源的情况下工作.
Note that the AWS lambda console UI adds the lambda permission for you invisibly, so beware that the aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter
will work without the permission resource if you happen to have done the same action before in the console UI.
必要的 TF 配置如下所示(最后两个资源是配置实际 cloudwatch->lambda
触发器的相关资源):
The necessary TF config looks like this (the last two resources are the relevant ones for configuring the actual cloudwatch->lambda
trigger):
// intended for application logs (access logs, modsec, etc.)
resource "aws_cloudwatch_log_group" "test-app-loggroup" {
name = "test-app"
retention_in_days = 90
}
resource "aws_security_group" "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-sg" {
name = "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-sg"
tags {
Name = "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-sg"
}
description = "Security group for lambda to move logs from CWL to SumoLogic"
vpc_id = "${aws_vpc.dev-vpc.id}"
}
resource "aws_security_group_rule" "https-egress-cloudwatch-sumologic-to-internet" {
type = "egress"
from_port = 443
to_port = 443
protocol = "tcp"
security_group_id = "${aws_security_group.cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-sg.id}"
cidr_blocks = ["0.0.0.0/0"]
}
resource "aws_iam_role" "test-cloudwatch-lambda-role" {
name = "test-cloudwatch-lambda-role"
assume_role_policy = <<EOF
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": "sts:AssumeRole",
"Principal": {
"Service": "lambda.amazonaws.com"
},
"Effect": "Allow"
}
]
}
EOF
}
resource "aws_iam_role_policy" "test-cloudwatch-lambda-policy" {
name = "test-cloudwatch-lambda-policy"
role = "${aws_iam_role.test-cloudwatch-lambda-role.id}"
policy = <<EOF
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "CopiedFromTemplateAWSLambdaVPCAccessExecutionRole1",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"ec2:CreateNetworkInterface"
],
"Resource": "*"
},
{
"Sid": "CopiedFromTemplateAWSLambdaVPCAccessExecutionRole2",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"ec2:DescribeNetworkInterfaces",
"ec2:DeleteNetworkInterface"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:ec2:ap-southeast-2:${var.dev_vpc_account_id}:network-interface/*"
},
{
"Sid": "CopiedFromTemplateAWSLambdaBasicExecutionRole1",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "logs:CreateLogGroup",
"Resource": "arn:aws:logs:ap-southeast-2:${var.dev_vpc_account_id}:*"
},
{
"Sid": "CopiedFromTemplateAWSLambdaBasicExecutionRole2",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"logs:CreateLogStream",
"logs:PutLogEvents"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:logs:ap-southeast-2:${var.dev_vpc_account_id}:log-group:/aws/lambda/*"
]
},
{
"Sid": "CopiedFromTemplateAWSLambdaAMIExecutionRole",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"ec2:DescribeImages"
],
"Resource": "*"
}
]
}
EOF
}
resource "aws_lambda_function" "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda" {
function_name = "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda"
filename = "${var.lambda_dir}/cloudwatchSumologicLambda.zip"
source_code_hash = "${base64sha256(file("${var.lambda_dir}/cloudwatchSumologicLambda.zip"))}"
handler = "cloudwatchSumologic.handler"
role = "${aws_iam_role.test-cloudwatch-lambda-role.arn}"
memory_size = "128"
runtime = "nodejs4.3"
// set low because I'm concerned about cost-blowout in the case of mis-configuration
timeout = "15"
vpc_config = {
subnet_ids = ["${aws_subnet.dev-private-subnet.id}"]
security_group_ids = ["${aws_security_group.cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-sg.id}"]
}
}
resource "aws_lambda_permission" "test-app-allow-cloudwatch" {
statement_id = "test-app-allow-cloudwatch"
action = "lambda:InvokeFunction"
function_name = "${aws_lambda_function.cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda.arn}"
principal = "logs.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com"
source_arn = "${aws_cloudwatch_log_group.test-app-loggroup.arn}"
}
resource "aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter" "test-app-cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-subscription" {
depends_on = ["aws_lambda_permission.test-app-allow-cloudwatch"]
name = "cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda-subscription"
log_group_name = "${aws_cloudwatch_log_group.test-app-loggroup.name}"
filter_pattern = ""
destination_arn = "${aws_lambda_function.cloudwatch-sumologic-lambda.arn}"
}
编辑:请注意,上面的 TF 代码是多年前编写的,使用版本 0.11.x
- 它应该仍然可以工作,但可能有更好的处理方式.具体来说,除非需要,否则不要使用这样的内联策略,请使用 aws_iam_policy_document 相反 - 它们只是随着时间的推移更容易维护.
EDIT: Please note that the above TF code was written years ago, using version 0.11.x
- it should still work but there may be better ways of doing things. Specifically, don't use an inline policy like this unless needed, use an aws_iam_policy_document instead - they're just way easier to maintain over time.
这篇关于Terraform:将 cloudwatch 日志订阅交付配置为 lambda?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!