问题描述
过去,我已经测试过预期的例外情况,如下所示:
In the past I have tested for expected exceptions like this:
[TestMethod]
public void TestThrowsException() {
try {
Foo();
Assert.Fail();
} catch (MyException ex){//good
}
}
但是,我注意到有一种(更干净的)方法可以使用ExpectedException属性对此进行测试.当未引发异常时,为什么此测试方法通过?当然,这违反了属性的目的.
However I notice that there is a (cleaner?) way to test this using the ExpectedException attribute. Why does this test method pass when the exception is not thrown? Surely this defeats the purpose of the attribute.
[TestMethod]
[ExpectedException(typeof(MyException))]
public void TestThrowsException() {
}
我正在使用Silverlight 2运行此测试
I am running this test using Silverlight 2
推荐答案
我从未见过这样的通行证-是您真正拥有的 吗?您是否绝对确定已将其标记为TestMethod
?测试跑步者是否显示通过?您肯定有最新的代码吗?
I've never seen that pass - is that really all you've got? Are you absolutely sure you have marked it as a TestMethod
? Does the test runner show it passing? Have you definitely got the most recent code?
我会仔细检查,但我确信那会失败...
I'll double check, but I'm sure that will fail...
这篇关于C#测试-在未引发异常的情况下,为什么ExpectedException标签方法通过?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!