当将ActiveRecord的节省联想？

问题描述

1）我知道，这将节省协会当自动保存：真正的按http://railsapi.com/doc/rails-v2.3.8/classes/ActiveRecord/AutosaveAssociation.html

1) I know that it will save associations when autosave: true as per http://railsapi.com/doc/rails-v2.3.8/classes/ActiveRecord/AutosaveAssociation.html

2）我知道，这将节省的构造像

2) I know that it will save associations that are constructed like

book = Book.new(name: 'foo')
book.authors.build(name: 'bar') #has_many
book.save

或如

book = Book.new(name: 'foo')
book.build_author(name: 'bar') #has_one
book.save

3）我认为协会也保存他们被分配或添加时

3) I think associations are also saved when they are assigned or added

book = Book.new(name: 'foo')
book.author = Author.new(name: 'bar')
book.save

或

book = Book.new(name: 'foo')
book.authors << Author.new(name: 'bar')
book.save

不过，我有一个涉及到的东西不会自动保存时，我希望到一个复杂的问题。所以，我想通过检查书来验证我的想法是要保存实际上将被保存到调试。

But, I have a complicated bug that involves something not auto-saving when I would expect it to. So, I want to debug by inspecting book to verify what I think is going to be saved will actually be saved.

TL; DR;节能协会在什么样的内部状态进行检查？我假设一个模型具有像内部的实例变量associations_to_save 的关联被添加到在创建时。然后，当模型保存，它遍历这些关联并保存它们。

TL; DR;What internal state is checked when saving associations? I'm assuming that a model has an internal instance variable like associations_to_save that associations get added to when they are created. Then, when the model is saved, it loops through those associations and saves them too.

推荐答案

不幸的是没有这样的事就像associations_to_save。但也有一些规则，说什么被保存时。你可以找到那些在这里：http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html.要点：4.1.5（belongs_to的），4.2.5（HAS_ONE），4.3.4（的has_many）和4.4.4（HABTM）

Unfortunately there are no such thing like associations_to_save. However there are some rules saying what is being saved when. You can find those here: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html. Points: 4.1.5 (belongs_to), 4.2.5 (has_one), 4.3.4 (has_many) and 4.4.4 (habtm).

更新：

在案件的has_many协会，孩子被保存在拯救父母，如果child.new_record？返回true（子尚未保存到分贝），或foreign_key列需要更新。这就是为什么：

In case of has_many association, the child is saved on saving the parent if child.new_record? returns true (child was not yet saved to db), or the foreign_key column needs to be updated. This is why:

1. 添加对象的关联上保存的父母确实保存新的孩子。
2. 添加对象关联的未保存的父母不保存（无外键值）
3. 如果未保存的父母被保存，并在协会缓存一些子对象，这些对象被保存到更新foreign_key。

这篇关于当将ActiveRecord的节省联想？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！