问题描述
我在CQ中部署了三个应用程序,它们都依赖于一个捆绑软件(例如核心)。
I have three applications deployed in CQ which all depend on one bundle (say 'core').
Core正在经历重大变革,需要定义所有三个应用程序对不同版本的Core的依赖关系,例如
Core is undergoing a major face lift and there is a requirement to define the dependency of all three application on different versions of core, e.g.
- A将依赖于核心1.0
- B将依赖于核心1.5
- C将依赖于核心2.0
是否可以这样做?
推荐答案
OSGi(已嵌入CQ本身)支持同时部署的多个版本的软件包。您可以部署 core的3个版本,然后在清单中为导入的应用程序请求特定版本:
OSGi (which CQ itself is embedded in) supports multiple versions of packages deployed at the same time. You could deploy the 3 versions of 'core' and then request a specific version in your Manifest for the importing applications:
Import-Package: package.name.of.core;version="1.0"
Bundle B
Bundle B
Import-Package: package.name.of.core;version="1.5"
捆绑C
Bundle C
Import-Package: package.name.of.core;version="2.0"
如果使用的是Maven Bundle插件,则可以通过捆绑包的POM进行相同的操作,以生成正确的Manifest标头:
If you're using the Maven Bundle plugin, you can do the same via your bundle's POM to generate the correct Manifest headers:
<dependency>
<groupId>group.of.core</groupId>
<artifactId>core</artifactId>
<version>2.0.0</version>
</dependency>
您可以在清单中提供绑定版本范围,例如
You could supply a bound version range in your Manifest, e.g.
Import-Package: package.name.of.core;version="[1.0,1.1)"
Bundle B
Bundle B
Import-Package: package.name.of.core;version="[1.5,1.6)"
捆绑C
Bundle C
Import-Package: package.name.of.core;version="[2.0,3.0)"
捆绑C(通过POM )
Bundle C (via POM)
<dependency>
<groupId>group.of.core</groupId>
<artifactId>core</artifactId>
<version>[2.0.0,3.0.0)</version>
</dependency>
这将允许您继承错误修复程序,例如-如果已部署的版本更改为 2.0.1
,则无需重新编译&
This would allow you to inherit bug fixes for example — if the deployed version changed to 2.0.1
, you wouldn't need to recompile & redeploy Bundle C.
- 方括号[即上面的
[
]告诉捆绑软件接受所提供的第一个版本。 - 右括号[即
)
]表示接受最多但不包括所提供的第二个版本。
- The open-square bracket [i.e.
[
] above tells the bundle to accept from the first version provided. - The closing bracket [i.e.
)
] tells it accept up to but excluding the second version provided.
附带说明一下,如果您的依赖项正确地控制了它们自己的版本控制(即遵循 ) ,您应该始终能够提供该版本的范围-从当前版本到下一个主要版本。
As a side note, if your dependencies are controlling their own versioning correctly (i.e. following semantic versioning), you should always be able to supply a range for the version — from the current version up to the next major release.
即在您的情况下,应用程序A也应该能够使用版本1.5,因为次要版本不应包含向后兼容性方面的重大更改。
I.e. in your case, Application A should also be able to use version 1.5, as a minor release shouldn't contain breaking changes in terms of backwards compatibility.
这篇关于一个OSGi实例中部署了多个捆绑版本的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!