本文介绍了我应该使用哪个Eclipse Subversion插件?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

,或?

a href =http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=zh-CN&rlz=&q=subclipse+vs+subversive&btnG=Google+Search&meta= =noreferrer >辩论,我们可以在这里得出一些结论吗?

There's a bit of debate around the topic, can we come to some conclusion here?

编辑:
这是一对夫妇几个月之前,我最终决定插件放慢了Eclipse的下降太多,而且每次从Eclipse外部更改文件时都是一个麻烦。
我把所有的插件都放在一起,然后用TortiseSVN。

It's been a couple months now, and I ended up deciding the plugin slowed Eclipse down too much, and was a hassle to use every time I changed a file from outside Eclipse.I ditched the plugin all together and just went with TortiseSVN.

推荐答案

这取决于。 对maven项目的检查项目具有优越的支持 - 这是我们使用Subclipse的唯一原因。除此之外,我注意到与SVN同步的subclipse错误。

This depends. Subclipse has superior support for checking out projects as maven projects - this is the sole reason we use Subclipse. Other than that, I have noticed subclipse bugs with syncing with SVN.

更好地检测新的文件以添加到版本控制,并且与分支的合并代码甚至与SVN同步(更少的错误等)也是非常优越的。所以真的,你应该问自己你想要什么价值。如果你不使用maven,我一定会去颠覆。

Subversive is much better at detecting new files to add to version control, and is also far superior with merging code from a branch, or even syncing with SVN (fewer bugs, etc.). So really, you should ask yourself what value you want. If you're not using maven, I would definitely go for Subversive.

这篇关于我应该使用哪个Eclipse Subversion插件?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

07-09 06:54