本文介绍了C ++从对列表中删除的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

很简单:我有下面的代码和方法 erase 不工作。我没有看到任何问题,因为如果我去,语法是:迭代器擦除(迭代器位置);

  list< pair< string,int>> l0 {{name1,20},{name2,30},{name3,40}}; 
for(auto& it:l0)
l0。擦除(it);

可能有一个问题,有一个列表对< string,int> 而不是列表 b
$ b

编辑:问题是代码不可编译。

解决方案

用于通过容器遍历访问容器中的
元素,而不是元素的迭代器。



因此在中为(auto& it:l0) c $ c>不是一个对的迭代器,但
a引用一个对。这就是为什么你的代码不能编译



这就是说,指出, of
,即使你的代码
编译它不会工作,因为迭代器无效后擦除:

解决方法

你不能使用range-for,而是使用传统的 for ,并使用 erase()

  for(auto it = l0.begin(); it! l0.end();)
it = l0.erase(it); //避免增加无效的迭代器


Very simple: I have the following code and the method erase is not working. I do not see any problem there because if I go to http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/list/list/erase/ , syntax is: iterator erase (iterator position);

list<pair<string,int>> l0 { { "name1", 20 }, { "name2", 30 }, { "name3", 40 } };
for( auto &it : l0 )
    l0 . erase( it );

May there be a problem that there is a list of pair<string,int> and not a list of a basic data types?

EDIT: The problem is that the code is not compilable.

解决方案

The range-for iterates through a container by giving you access to the elements in the container, and not an iterator to an element.

So in for( auto &it : l0 ), it isn't an iterator to a pair but a reference to a pair. This is why your code doesn't compile

This being said, as πάνταῥεῖ pointed out when he initially closed this as a duplicate ofKeeping a valid vector::iterator after erase(), even if your code would compile it wouldn't work because of the invalidation of the iterator following the erase:

Workaround

You shall not use the range-for, but the traditional for, and iterating using the return value of erase() :

for (auto it=l0.begin(); it!=l0.end(); ) 
    it = l0.erase(it);  // to avoid incrementing an invalidated iterator

Live demo

这篇关于C ++从对列表中删除的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

10-22 15:39