问题描述
我一直试图理解 0x40
REX操作码用于ASM x64指令的目的。例如,在此函数的序言中,来自Kernel32.dll:
如您所见,他们将 push rbx
用作:
40 53 push rbx
但仅使用 53h
操作码(不带前缀)也会产生相同的结果:
根据
所以 40h
操作码似乎什么也没做。有人可以解释其目的吗?
04xh
字节(即 040h
, 041h
... 04fh
)确实是REX字节。正如您在问题中列出的那样,下半字节的每一位都有含义。值 040h
表示 REX.W
, REX.R
, REX.X
和 REX.B
均 0
。这意味着添加此字节不会对该指令产生任何作用,因为您不会覆盖任何默认REX位,而且它不是AH / BH / CH / DH为8位指令
此外, X
, R
和 B
位都对应于某些操作数。如果您的指令不使用这些操作数,则相应的REX位将被忽略。
I've been trying to understand the purpose of the 0x40
REX opcode for ASM x64 instructions. Like for instance, in this function prologue from Kernel32.dll:
As you see they use push rbx
as:
40 53 push rbx
But using just the 53h
opcode (without the prefix) also produces the same result:
According to this site, the layout for the REX prefix is as follows:
So 40h
opcode seems to be not doing anything. Can someone explain its purpose?
the 04xh
bytes (i.e. 040h
, 041h
... 04fh
) are indeed REX bytes. Each bit in the lower nibble has a meaning, as you listed in your question. The value 040h
means that REX.W
, REX.R
, REX.X
and REX.B
are all 0
. That means that adding this byte doesn't do anything to this instruction, because you're not overriding any default REX bits, and it's not an 8-bit instruction with AH/BH/CH/DH as an operand.
Moreover, the X
, R
and B
bits all correspond to some operands. If your instruction doesn't consume these operands, then the corresponding REX bit is ignored.
这篇关于ASM x64中40h REX操作码的用途是什么?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!