OOP术语：“容器” & “收集”

问题描述

C ++术语Container是否与Java术语Collection完全相同？

b C ++术语容器更强调包含项目的所有权，而不是Java的集合，因为没有明确的内存所有权（由于垃圾回收）。

当容器被销毁（因此项目被包含或拥有）时，C ++容器中的项目会被销毁，如果一个集合本身是垃圾，Java项目可能会继续存在

Is the C++ term "Container" simply synonymous with the Java term "Collection" ?

解决方案

Yes.

Though, if I may speculate here, C++ term container better emphasizes ownership of contained items, as opposed to Java's collection, where there is no explicit memory ownership (due to garbage collection).

Items in a C++ container are destroyed when a container is destroyed (hence items are contained or owned), in Java items may continue to exist if a collection itself is garbage collected.

这篇关于OOP术语：“容器” & “收集”的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！