本文介绍了我应该使用WebMatrix中构建一个真实世界的网站?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我已经经历了数百篇文章和博客去了WebMatrix的说法仅仅是为初学者和这样的。我的问题是,为什么我不应该用WebMatrix中创建一个真实世界的工作网站,像轻量Q&放大器;一个网站吗?我们可以创建所需的网站,用这个工具什么。那么为什么不使用它呢?是有什么真正的网站所需要的,不能由WebMatrix中得到完成?它看起来像它是确定创建此工具全面的功能和强大的网站。但人家说你不应该使用它,为什么?

I have gone through hundreds of articles and blog posts that saying WebMatrix is just for beginners and such. my question is, why shouldn't I use WebMatrix to create a real-world working website, like a light-weight Q&A website? we can create anything that is needed for a website, with this tool. so why not to use it? is there something that real websites need, that cannot get done by WebMatrix? it looks like it is ok to create a fully functional and strong website with this tool. but people say you should not use it, why?

和我道歉,我糟糕的英国!
先谢谢了。

and I apologize for my terrible English!thanks in advance.

推荐答案

有些人认为所有的真实世界的应用程序都需要大量的架构庞大蔓延的东西,团队开发者多,源控制,测试等,等这些类型的应用程序将不适合WebMatrix中。数以百万计现实世界的应用程序实际上已采取轻量级Q&放大器的形状;一个网站,博客等,建造和由一个人维护。你当然可以建造这些使用WebMatrix中。

Some people think that all "real world" apps are gargantuan sprawling things that need massive architecture, multiple devs in teams, source controls, tests etc, etc. Those types of apps would not be suitable for WebMatrix. Millions of real world apps do actually take the shape of lightweight Q & A sites, blogs etc, and are built and maintained by one person. You can certainly build these using WebMatrix.

提示为未来:如果负载的人说博客不要做X,但没有解释为什么,你可以pretty确保他们没有得到什么线索,他们在谈论什么。出于某种原因,WebMatrix中吸引了大量的这些类型的人......

Tip for the future: if loads of people blog saying "Don't do X" but don't explain why, you can be pretty sure that they haven't got a clue what they are talking about. For some reason, WebMatrix has attracted the attention of lots of those type of people...

这篇关于我应该使用WebMatrix中构建一个真实世界的网站?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

09-09 03:26