问题描述
我对Tidyverse相当精通，但始终使用 ifelse（）而不是dplyr if_else（） 。我想切换此行为并将默认设置为始终使用 dplyr :: if_else（）并从我的版本中弃用 ifelse（）代码。
I am fairly proficient within the Tidyverse, but have always used ifelse() instead of dplyr if_else(). I want to switch this behavior and default to always using dplyr::if_else() and deprecating ifelse() from my code.
是否有任何理由不这样做？这会给我带来麻烦吗？我将为您省去细节，但是最近，当我在不知不觉中在数据分析中创建一列字符矩阵时，却不使用 if_else（）使我烦恼。如果我切换为始终使用 if_else（），则希望以后避免该问题。
Is there any reason not to do this? Would this likely get me into trouble? I'll spare you the details, but recently, not using if_else() screwed me up, when I unknowingly created a column of character matrices in my data analysis. If I switch to always using if_else() I hope to avoid this issue in the future.
推荐答案
if_else 更为严格。它检查两个选择是否具有相同的类型，否则引发错误，而 ifelse 将根据需要提升类型。在某些情况下这可能是一个好处，但是如果您不检查错误或明确强制类型转换，则可能会破坏脚本。例如：
if_else is more strict. It checks that both alternatives are of the same type and otherwise throws an error, while ifelse will promote types as necessary. This may be a benefit in some circumstances, but may otherwise break scripts if you don't check for errors or explicitly force type conversion. For example:
ifelse(c(TRUE,TRUE,FALSE),"a",3)
[1] "a" "a" "3"
if_else(c(TRUE,TRUE,FALSE),"a",3)
Error: `false` must be type character, not double
这篇关于dplyr if_else（）与基准R ifelse（）的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！