问题描述
基本上，我想要一种正确在片段之间共享ViewModel或在ViewModels之间共享LiveData的方法.
Basically I want a way to properly share ViewModels between fragments OR share LiveData between ViewModels.
我的情况:
我有2个片段(FragmentA& FragmentB)-每个片段都有自己的ViewModel:
I have 2 fragments (FragmentA & FragmentB) - each has its own ViewModels:
FragmentA具有ViewModelA，FragmentB具有ViewModelB.
ViewModelA具有LiveDataA1，ViewModelB具有LiveDataB1和LiveDataB2
ViewModelB仅允许具有LiveDataB2，而ViewModelA不能具有.
ViewModelB is only allowed to have LiveDataB2 and ViewModelA cannot have it.
问题是我希望FragmentA观察ViewModelB中的LiveDataB2.
方法1:
除了ViewModelA之外，ViewModelB也用在FragmentA中(因此就像FragmentA中的2个ViewModels).因此FragmentA将观察ViewModelB中的LiveDataB2.
Aside from ViewModelA, ViewModelB is also be used in FragmentA (so it's like 2 ViewModels in FragmentA).So FragmentA will observe LiveDataB2 from ViewModelB.
这是我目前的实现方式.但是我觉得拥有另一个用于其他片段的ViewModel是不合适的.我认为每个Fragment应该只有1个ViewModel.
This is my current implementation now. But I feel like it's not proper to have another ViewModel that is intended for other fragments.I thinking that each Fragment should only have 1 ViewModel.
方法2:
创建一个新的SharedViewModel.因此，我们现在将拥有3个ViewModel:ViewModelA具有LiveDataA1，ViewModelB具有LiveDataB1，SharedViewModel具有LiveDataB2.(在这里，我将LiveDataB2从ViewModelB移到了SharedViewModel)
Create a new SharedViewModel.So we will have 3 ViewModels now:ViewModelA has LiveDataA1, ViewModelB has LiveDataB1, SharedViewModel has LiveDataB2.(Here I move LiveDataB2 from ViewModelB to SharedViewModel)
除了ViewModelA以外，在FragmentA中也使用SharedViewModel.因此FragmentA将观察SharedViewModel中的LiveDataB2.
Aside from ViewModelA, SharedViewModel is also be used in FragmentA.So FragmentA will observe LiveDataB2 from SharedViewModel.
所以我想它和#1一样，但是我想在这里我想SharedViewModel只是一个实用的ViewModel，就像获取所需的共享数据一样.所以在这里，我们就像将所有可以在FragmentA和FragmentB(甚至与其他片段)之间共享/共享的LiveData一样.
So I guess its the same as #1 but I guess but here I'm thinking that SharedViewModel is just a util ViewModel to just like get the shared data needed.So here we are like putting all the LiveDatas that can be common/shared between FragmentA and FragmentB (or even with other fragments)
方法3:
在ViewModel之间共享LiveData.我认为这太疯狂了，我不知道如何实现.但是我认为ViewModelA中将有一个新的LiveDataA2，它与ViewModelB中的LiveDataB2所引用的实例相同.
Share LiveData between ViewModels.I think this is wild and I don't know how to implement this.But I'm thinking that there will a new LiveDataA2 in ViewModelA that refers to the same instance as LiveDataB2 in ViewModelB.
因此，FragmentA仅具有ViewModelA，并且可以观察LiveDataA2.如果ViewModelB中的LiveDataB2中有更改，则FragmentA将具有该更改.
So FragmentA will only have ViewModelA and can observe LiveDataA2.If there is a change in LiveDataB2 in ViewModelB, FragmentA will have it.
在这里几乎需要一些建议，以正确的方式使用！
推荐答案
共享ViewModel 是正确的方法
对于具有多个实时数据对象LiveDataA1，LiveDataB1和LiveDataB2的两个片段FragmentA和FragmentB，您应该使用单个Shared ViewModel，通过这种方法，您的FragmentA可以轻松观察.
You should use a single Shared ViewModel for both fragments FragmentA and FragmentB with multiple live data objects LiveDataA1, LiveDataB1 and LiveDataB2, with this approach your FragmentA can easily observe LiveDataB2.
现在，您的方法存在的问题是:
Now, the problem with your approaches are:
方法#1:
如果FragmentA创建ViewModelB的实例，您将不会与FragmentB关联ViewModelB，因此ViewModelB会丢失其状态.
If FragmentA creates an instance of ViewModelB you will not get ViewModelB associate with FragmentB so ViewModelB lost its state.
方法2:
问题是，当有推荐的方法(例如，根据官方文档Shared ViewModel)时，您正在创建单独的ViewModel
Somehow the problem is you are creating separate ViewModel when there is a recommended way i.e Shared ViewModel as per official docs
方法3:
共享LiveData对象不是正确的方法，因为它与生命周期所有者相关联.
Sharing LiveData objects is not the right approach as it is associated with lifecycle owner.
这篇关于在片段之间共享ViewModels或在ViewModels之间共享LiveData的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！