套接字超时使得使用DefaultHTTPClient HTTPGET请求时

本文介绍了套接字超时使得使用DefaultHTTPClient HTTPGET请求时的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述 29岁程序员，3月因学历无情被辞！ 有哪些优点和缺点背后重用 DefaultHTTPClient 从Android应用程序发送HTTP请求时到外部服务器？我试图用重复使用 DefaultHTTPClient 制作时，周期性 HTTPGET 的要求，但我得到随机插座超时（特别是使用3G的时候）What are the pros and cons behind reusing DefaultHTTPClient when sending HTTP requests from an Android app to an external server? I tried using reusing a DefaultHTTPClient when making periodic HTTPGet requests, but I get random socket timeouts (specially when using 3G).我的code看起来如下：My code looks like follows:public class MyHTTPSender { private DefaultHTTPClient mClient; public MyHTTPSender() { mClient = new DefaultHTTPClient(); } public void send(String httpAddress) {HttpGet get = new HttpGet(this.surrogateURL); HttpResponse response = null;try { response = httpClient.execute(get); // ... consume entity if OK } catch (Exception e) { } finally { if (response != null) { // do some sanity checks to ensure Entity is there! response.getEntity().consumeContent(); } } }}我看不出什么问题，我在做什么。我有一个单独的处理程序，使HTTPPost请求，并且工作得很好（使用不同的DefaultHTTPClient对象）。I can't see anything wrong with what I am doing. I have a separate handler that make HTTPPost requests, and that works perfectly well (uses a different DefaultHTTPClient object).有什么建议？推荐答案什么API级别是你吗？What API level are you on?如果你是在8级以上，你可能会考虑尝试 AndroidHttpClient ，它可以指定一个较好的插座超时。If you're on 8 or above you might consider trying AndroidHttpClient, which may have a better socket timeouts specified.否则，你可能会检查你如何创建 DefaultHttpClient 并尝试指定更长的超时。Otherwise, you might examine how you're creating the DefaultHttpClient and try specifying longer timeouts. 这篇关于套接字超时使得使用DefaultHTTPClient HTTPGET请求时的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！ 上岸，阿里云！