如何明确实例在C ++ MPL向量的所有成员的模板？

问题描述

考虑以下头文件：

// Foo.h
class Foo {
    public: 
        template <typename T>
        void read(T& value);
};

我要明确地实例化在所有类型的源文件的Foo ::阅读成员函数模板包含在的boost :: MPL： ：矢量：

// Foo.cc
#include <boost/mpl/vector.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/begin_end.hpp>
#include "Foo.h"

template <typename T>
void Foo::read(T& value) { /* do something */ }

typedef boost::mpl::vector<int, long, float> types;

// template Foo::read<int  >(int&);
// template Foo::read<long >(long&);
// template Foo::read<float>(float&);

// instantiate automatically ???

这可能吗？在此先感谢，丹尼尔。

Is it possible? Thanks in advance, Daniel.

修改

我找到了一些解决方案 - 它似乎分配一个指针富::阅读＆LT; T＆GT; 在一个结构的构造，它的变量随后宣布，因实例：

I found some solution - it seems that assigning a pointer to Foo::read<T> in the constructor of a struct, of which variable is then declared, cause instantiation:

// intermezzo
template <typename T> struct Bar {
    Bar<T>() {
        void (Foo::*funPtr)(T&) = &Foo::read<T>;
    }
};

static Bar<int  > bar1;
static Bar<long > bar2;
static Bar<float> bar3;

于是该过程可以automatized如下：

So then the process can be automatized as follows:

// Foo.cc continued
template <typename B, typename E>
struct my_for_each {
    my_for_each<B, E>() {
        typedef typename B::type T;      // vector member
        typedef void (Foo::*FunPtr)(T&); // pointer to Foo member function
        FunPtr funPtr = &Foo::read<T>;   // cause instantiation?
    }

    my_for_each<typename boost::mpl::next<B>::type, E> next;
};

template<typename E>
struct my_for_each<E, E> {};

static my_for_each< boost::mpl::begin<types>::type,
                    boost::mpl::end<types>::type > first;

但我不知道，如果这个解决方案是便携式和符合标准的？ （与英特尔和GNU编译器。）

But I don't know if this solution is portable and standard-conformant? (Works with Intel and GNU compilers.)

推荐答案

如果你打算使用你的类只在单个模块（即你不会导出），可以使用升压/ MPL /的for_each。这种方式定义（使用MPL /的for_each）模板功能不会被导出（即使你申报类名或函数签名之前__declspec（出口））：

If you intend to use your class only in a single module (i.e. you won't export it) you can use boost/mpl/for_each. The template function defined this way (using mpl/for_each) won't be exported (even if you declare __declspec(export) before class name or function signature):

// Foo.cpp
#include <boost/mpl/vector.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/for_each.hpp>

template<class T>
void read(T& value)
{
...
}

using types = boost::mpl::vector<long, int>;

//template instantiation
struct call_read {
  template <class T> 
  void operator()(T)
  {
    T t; //You should make sure that T can be created this way
    ((Foo*)nullptr)->read<T>(t); //this line tells to compiler with templates it should instantiate
  }
};

void instantiate()
{
  boost::mpl::for_each<types>(call_read());
}

如果你需要导出/导入您结构和模板方法存在使用升压/ preprocessor解决方案

If you need export/import you structure and template methods there is the solution using boost/preprocessor

// Foo.h
#ifdef <preprocessor definition specific to DLL>
#    define API __declspec(dllexport)
#else
#    define API __declspec(dllimport)
#endif

class API Foo {
public:
  template<class T> void read(T& value);
};

// Foo.cpp
#include <boost/preprocessor/seq/for_each.hpp>
#include <boost/preprocessor/seq/enum.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/vector.hpp>

template<class T>
void read(T& value)
{
...
}

//using this macro you can define both boost::mpl structure AND instantiate explicitly your template function
#define VARIANT_LIST (std::wstring)(long)(int)
using types = boost::mpl::vector<BOOST_PP_SEQ_ENUM(VARIANT_LIST)>;

//Here we should use our API macro
#define EXPLICIT_INSTANTIATION(r, d, __type__) \
  template API void Foo::read<__type__>(__type__&);
BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH(EXPLICIT_INSTANTIATION, _, VARIANT_LIST)

如果您不需要这个额外的功能的第一个解决方案是干净多了我觉得

If you don't need this extra functionality the first solution is much cleaner I guess

这篇关于如何明确实例在C ++ MPL向量的所有成员的模板？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！