问题描述
由于绝大多数显示器都是，选择配色方案时甚至考虑网络安全的颜色是否有意义？或者是应该作为一个琐事被归为历史的东西？
Since the vast majority of monitors are 16-bit color or more, including mobile devices, does it make sense to even consider web-safe colors when choosing color schemes? Or is it something that ought to be relegated to history as a piece of trivia?
对于那些不知道网络安全的颜色的人： p>
For those of you that don't know what web-safe colors are:
颜色列表通常呈现
，就像它有特殊的属性，
使它们免受抖动的影响。在
的事实上，在256色显示器上
应用程序可以设置任何
选择颜色的调色板，
将其余部分抖动。这些颜色是
，因为他们
匹配
选择的调色板，然后是主导的浏览器应用程序。
The list of colors is often presented as if it has special properties that render them immune to dithering. In fact, on 256-color displays applications can set a palette of any selection of colors that they choose, dithering the rest. These colors were chosen specifically because they matched the palettes selected by the then leading browser applications.
推荐答案
对我来说，网络安全调色板不再是主要关注点。优化目标受众群体。
For me web safe color palette is no longer primary concern. Optimize for the largest target audience.
根据网站访客：
- 2009年1月 1％的网站访问者拥有256色显示，95％的用户有
24或32位。 - [更新] 2015年1月 0.5％有256色，0.5％有24位，99％有32位
- In January 2009 1% of site visitors had 256 color displays, 95% of users had24 or 32 bit.
- [Update] In January 2015 0.5% had 256 colours, 0.5% had 24 bit and 99% had 32 bit
我从一个我照顾的商业应用程序网站中发现了类似的数字：
I found similar numbers from a business app site that I look after:
32-bit 79.01%
24-bit 15.64%
16-bit 5.27%
8-bit 0.08%
这篇关于网络安全的颜色是否仍然相关？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！