本文介绍了静态const与const静态的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！
问题描述
我不了解C ++类中这两个语句之间的区别:
I do not understand the difference between these two statements in my C++ class:
class MyClass {
public:
private:
static const int var = 0; // Option 1
const static int var = 0; // Option 2
};
b/w选项1和选项2有什么区别?他们都编译.
What is the difference b/w Option 1 and Option 2?? They both compile.
推荐答案
它们的含义完全相同.您可以自由选择任何您认为更容易阅读的内容.
They mean exactly the same thing. You're free to choose whichever you think is easier to read.
在C语言中，您应该将 static 放在开始位置，但这不是必需的.在这方面，我不确定C ++是否遵循C.
In C, you should place static at the start, but it's not yet required. I'm not sure if C++ followed C in this regard.
1除声明开头外，存储类说明符的位置声明中的说明符是过时的功能.
1 The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent feature.
这篇关于静态const与const静态的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！