问题描述
尝试捕捉显着实现之间的差异:
An attempt to capture notable differences between implementations:
(我知道 Smith，但不要相信它仍然有效).
(I'm aware of Smith, but don't believe it's still active).
包括 CFML 和平台差异 - 语法、功能和可扩展性.
Include CFML and platform differences - syntax, feature, and extensibility.
请注意，这不是我在其他任何地方都没有见过的东西，但也许我只是没有正确搜索.因此，指向该目的的链接也很重要.
Note, this is not something I've not seen anywhere else, but maybe I'm just not searching correctly. So links to that end would count too.
更新
这是我在这种情况下对显着的定义:简化解决难题的方法.例如，Railo 提供了 <cfvideo> 标签，它可以对视频进行转码——这是一项非常重要的任务.
Here's my definition of notable in this context: something that simplifies solving a difficult problem. For example, Railo offers the <cfvideo> tag, which transcodes video - a non trivial task.
我的建议是不值得注意:Railo 函数 ListAvg().
Something I would suggest is not notable: the Railo function ListAvg().
推荐答案
标记为社区 wiki.
Marking as a community wiki.
概览
- ColdFusion 和 Railo 的博客文章比较 - 评论同样有趣.
- Blog post comparing of ColdFusion and Railo - comments are just as interesting.
我称之为值得注意"的项目的汇总:
Aggregation of items I've called "notable":
打开蓝龙
- 基于 Web 的线路调试器:基于 Adobe Eclipse 是挑剔的.
- Memcached 集成:Adobe ehcache 解决方案有效好吧，但 memcached 似乎仍然具有更好的故障转移和分片.事实上，分片似乎只能在 Adobe 中使用 Terracotta 或滚动您自己的.
- 在 Google App Engine 上运行
- Web based line debugger: Adobe Eclipse based is finicky.
- Memcached intregration: Adobe ehcache solution works well, but memcached still appears to have better failover and sharding. In fact, sharding appears to only be available in Adobe with Terracotta or rolling your own.
- Runs on Google App Engine
雷洛
<cfvideo>:视频转码，付费功能，但成本低，免费选项是ffmpeg，但有合法问号clusterscope:解决服务器之间消息传递的有趣方式，付费功能.
<cfvideo>: video transcoding, pay feature, but low cost, free option is ffmpeg, but that has legal question marksclusterscope: interesting way of solving messaging between servers, pay feature.
这篇关于Railo、Open Bluedragon 和 Adobe Coldfusion 之间有哪些显着差异?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！