arial和卷曲引号的问题

I tried changing font-family from helvetica to arial and discoveredthat I loose typographic quotes, etc. (for example, if I have “in a page, the double opening quotation mark is not curly). The reason for trying arial was that I understood it was easierreading, although I still find helvetica easier (what is theconsensus, if any, on this issue?). I suspect that arial uses Microsoft''s 1252 code page and so does notmake “ typographic, but straight. -- Haines Brown, KB1GRM 推荐答案 2006年11月2日星期四，Haines Brown写道： On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Haines Brown wrote: I尝试将字体系列从helvetica更改为arial，并发现，我打印了排版报价等等（例如，如果我在页面中有，那么双重打开引号不卷曲）。 I tried changing font-family from helvetica to arial and discoveredthat I loose typographic quotes, etc. (for example, if I have “in a page, the double opening quotation mark is not curly). 当字体太小时，它只显示*。 http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...mp/quotes.html It only *seems* so when the font size is too small. http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...mp/quotes.html Haines Brown写道： Haines Brown wrote: > 原因尝试arial是我明白它更容易阅读， >The reason for trying arial was that I understood it was easierreading, 这是非常主观的。比什么更容易？ - Berg That''s highly subjective. Easier than what? --Berg Haines Brown写道： Haines Brown wrote: 我尝试将字体系列从helvetica更改为arial并发现我放弃了印刷报价等（对于例如，如果我在页面中有，则双开引号不是卷曲的。 I tried changing font-family from helvetica to arial and discoveredthat I loose typographic quotes, etc. (for example, if I have “in a page, the double opening quotation mark is not curly). " curly quotes"历史上有许多数字表示，见例如 < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Quotation_marks_in_English>。这种方式永远不会使用数字实体对于他们而且只有HTML实体 & lsquo;和& rsquo; （单身）和& ldquo; &安培; rdquo;的（双）在XSLT模板中，通过它们的Unicode 值在内部DTD子集中定义它们 "curly quotes" historically have a number of numeric representations,see for instance<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Quotation_marks_in_English>. This way never use "numeric entities" for them but only HTML entities‘ and ’ (single) and “ ” (double) In XSLT templates define them in internal DTD subset by their Unicodevalues 尝试arial的原因是我明白它更容易阅读，但我仍然觉得helvetica更容易（如果有的话，这个问题是什么？b ）？）。 The reason for trying arial was that I understood it was easierreading, although I still find helvetica easier (what is theconsensus, if any, on this issue?). 你必须要混淆一些东西。对于非Windows平台，Helvetica是传统的后备字体： font-family：Arial，Helvetica，sans-serif; 或者（在政治上正确:-) font-family：Helvetica，Arial，sans-serif; 在Windows平台上，除非另外另外提供Helvetica 已安装。 You must be confusing something. Helvetica is a traditional fall-backfont for non-Windows platforms:font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;or (to be politically correct :-)font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; On Windows platforms Helvetica is not presented unless additionallyinstalled. 这篇关于arial和卷曲引号的问题的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！