问题描述
只是想知道关于Azure门户提供的信息与Cloudyn的共识是什么.以RI建议为例-到目前为止，门户网站建议我可以/应该购买8个RI VM，而Cloudyn建议我可以/应该购买 25个RI.
Just wondering what the consensus is regarding the information that Azure portal provides vs Cloudyn. Take RI recommendations for example - as of today the portal advises that I can/should purchase 8 RI VM's, whereas Cloudyn advises that I can/should purchase 25 RI's.
很显然，这25种声音在省钱方面更具吸引力，但哪种观点通常更准确?
Obviously the 25 sounds more appealing in terms of saving money, but which view is generally the more accurate?
谢谢.
D
推荐答案
感谢您使用Cloudyn的Azure Cost Management，并发布了此问题.
Thank you for using Azure Cost Management by Cloudyn and for posting this question.
Cloudyn将基于比.由于存在较大差异，因此您应该首先评估购买RI的影响:
Cloudyn will provide recommendations based on more factors than Azure Advisor. Because of the large discrepancy though, you should first assess the impact of the RI purchase:
- 要花多少钱?
- 要省多少钱?
- 收支平衡点是什么?
此文章将帮助解释确定何时使用RI VM的一些方法.了解何时使用RI VM的收支平衡点也将帮助您确定最适合自己的解决方案.有关Azure成本管理的一些注意事项是，它通过以下方式支持保留的实例和混合权益:
This RI Recommendations article will help explain some of the ways to determine when to go with an RI VM. Knowing the break-even point for when to use RI VMs will also help you determine what is right for you.Some things to note about Azure Cost Management is that it supports reserved instances and Hybrid Benefits by:
- 为您显示与定价模型相关的费用
- 跟踪RI的使用情况
- 评估RI影响
- 根据您的政策分配RI费用
- Showing you the costs associated with pricing models
- Tracking RI usage
- Assessing RI impact
- Allocating RI costs according to your policies
有关更多信息，请查看有关更多详细信息，请参见Azure成本管理上的tutorial-optimize-reserved-instances 文档.
For more information, please review the tutorial-optimize-reserved-instances documentation on Azure Cost Management for more details.
谢谢
本
这篇关于Azure门户与Cloudyn的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！