本文介绍了F1 micro和Accuracy一样吗?的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！
问题描述
我在scikit-learn中尝试了许多有关F1 micro和Accuracy的示例，在所有这些示例中，我看到F1 micro与Accuracy相同.总是这样吗?
I have tried many examples with F1 micro and Accuracy in scikit-learn and in all of them, I see that F1 micro is the same as Accuracy. Is this always true?
脚本
from sklearn import svm
from sklearn import metrics
from sklearn.cross_validation import train_test_split
from sklearn.datasets import load_iris
from sklearn.metrics import f1_score, accuracy_score
# prepare dataset
iris = load_iris()
X = iris.data[:, :2]
y = iris.target
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2)
# svm classification
clf = svm.SVC(kernel='rbf', gamma=0.7, C = 1.0).fit(X_train, y_train)
y_predicted = clf.predict(X_test)
# performance
print "Classification report for %s" % clf
print metrics.classification_report(y_test, y_predicted)
print("F1 micro: %1.4f\n" % f1_score(y_test, y_predicted, average='micro'))
print("F1 macro: %1.4f\n" % f1_score(y_test, y_predicted, average='macro'))
print("F1 weighted: %1.4f\n" % f1_score(y_test, y_predicted, average='weighted'))
print("Accuracy: %1.4f" % (accuracy_score(y_test, y_predicted)))
输出
Classification report for SVC(C=1.0, cache_size=200, class_weight=None, coef0=0.0,
decision_function_shape=None, degree=3, gamma=0.7, kernel='rbf',
max_iter=-1, probability=False, random_state=None, shrinking=True,
tol=0.001, verbose=False)
precision recall f1-score support
0 1.00 0.90 0.95 10
1 0.50 0.88 0.64 8
2 0.86 0.50 0.63 12
avg / total 0.81 0.73 0.74 30
F1 micro: 0.7333
F1 macro: 0.7384
F1 weighted: 0.7381
Accuracy: 0.7333
F1 micro =准确性
推荐答案
在确保将每个测试用例完全分配给一个类的分类任务中，micro-F等同于准确性.多标签分类不会是这种情况.
In classification tasks for which every test case is guaranteed to be assigned to exactly one class, micro-F is equivalent to accuracy. It won't be the case in multi-label classification.
这篇关于F1 micro和Accuracy一样吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！