问题描述
我正在尝试根据其类型参数修改 List.toString
的行为.由于 List
不能被扩展,它被一个自定义类 CList
包裹(可能是隐式的,但问题会保持不变?).打印 CList
的 CList
时出现问题.以下是评论中的示例和相应输出:
I am trying to modify the behavior of List.toString
according to its type parameter. Since List
can't be extended, it is wrapped by a custom class CList
(could be with implicits, but the problem would remain the same?). The problem arises when printing a CList
of CList
s. Below are examples and respective output in comments:
object Foo {
import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._
class CList[A: TypeTag](val l: List[A]) {
override def toString = typeOf[A] match {
case t if t =:= typeOf[Char] => l.mkString
case _ => "[" + l.mkString(", ") + "]"
}
}
}
import Foo.CList
val c = new CList(List(1, 2)) // prints "[1, 2]"
println(c)
val c2 = new CList(List('a', 'b')) // prints "ab"
println(c2)
val c3 = new CList(List(
List(1, 2),
List(3, 4)))
println(c3) // prints "[List(1, 2), List(3, 4)]"
val c4 = new CList(List(
new CList(List(1, 2)),
new CList(List(3, 4))))
println(c4) // prints "No TypeTag available for this.Foo.C[Int]"
推荐答案
我能够将代码减少到:
import scala.reflect.runtime.universe.TypeTag
class A
implicitly[TypeTag[A]]
当它与scala解释器一起运行时,它给出一个错误No TypeTag available for this.A
.查看解释器生成的代码,我想出了编译器无法处理的代码:
When it is run with scala interpreter, it gives an error No TypeTag available for this.A
. Looking at code produced by the interpreter, I came up with code that compiler can't handle:
class Main {
class A
def main(args: Array[String]) {
class B
implicitly[TypeTag[A]] // ok
implicitly[TypeTag[B]] // error
}
}
因此,编译器似乎无法为方法中定义的类生成类型标记.使用 -Xlog-implicits
运行会抱怨 无法创建引用本地类 Main.B 的 TypeTag:改用 WeakTypeTag
.
So it seems, that the compiler can't generate type tags for classes defined inside methods. Running with -Xlog-implicits
complains cannot create a TypeTag referring to local class Main.B: use WeakTypeTag instead
.
这篇关于为什么嵌套实例化中没有可用的 TypeTag(当由 Scala 代码运行器解释时)?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!