问题描述
有没有办法冻结了的IQueryable
所以没有额外的连接访问数据库时,将添加到查询?例如,我可以做一个 .ToList()
冻结查询,但有性能影响,因为我做的任何过滤是中间层上,我没有从预过滤的性能提升数据库服务器
Is there a way to freeze an IQueryable
so that no additional joins will be added to the query when hitting the database? For example, I could do a .ToList()
to freeze the query, but that has performance impacts because any filtering I do is on the middle layer and I don't have any performance gains from pre-filtering on the db server?
修改为清楚起见上:
我有一个返回的IQueryable
客户端可以过滤/排序/按需要项目OData服务。我只是想阻止他们拉更多的数据出来。我能做到这一点做了ToList()。AsQueryable已()
,但失去了惰性加载的优势,有了它,可以让客户端过滤请求的全部目的
I have an OData service which returns an IQueryable
that the client can filter/sort/project as needed. I just want to prevent them from pulling more data out. I could do that by doing ToList().AsQueryable()
, but that loses the advantage of lazyLoading, and with it, the whole purpose of allowing the client to filter the request.
这是我看着一个方案是设置: EnableQueryAttribute.AllowedQueryOptions
排除展开
,但即使我的初始查询有所扩大,客户端仍然选择那些部分预防。
One option that I looked at was to set: EnableQueryAttribute.AllowedQueryOptions
to exclude Expand
, however even if my initial Query had been expanded, the client is still prevented from selecting those parts.
推荐答案
林假设你确实有一个的IQueryable< T>
,而不是的IQueryable
。
如果你不想让你有客户端的所有访问的IQueryable< T>
方法,不返回的IQueryable< ; T>
。既然你想让他们只能够过滤器/排序/项目,创建一个对象巫婆包含的IQueryable< T>
,但只公开所需的方法和使用:
Im assuming that you actually have an IQueryable<T>
instead of a IQueryable
.
If you don't want your client having access to all IQueryable<T>
methods, don't return an IQueryable<T>
. Since you want them to be able to only filter/sort/project, create a object witch contains an IQueryable<T>
but only expose the desired methods, and use that:
public interface IDataResult<T>
{
IDataResult<T> FilterBy(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate);
IDataResult<TResult> ProjectTo<TResult>(Expression<Func<T, TResult>> predicate);
IDataResult<T> SortBy<TKey>(Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector);
IDataResult<T> SortByDescending<TKey>(Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector);
List<T> ToList();
IEnumerable<T> AsEnumerable();
}
public class DataResult<T> : IDataResult<T>
{
private IQueryable<T> Query { get; set; }
public DataResult(IQueryable<T> originalQuery)
{
this.Query = originalQuery;
}
public IDataResult<T> FilterBy(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate)
{
return new DataResult<T>(this.Query.Where(predicate));
}
public IDataResult<T> SortBy<TKey>(Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector)
{
return new DataResult<T>(this.Query.OrderBy(keySelector));
}
public IDataResult<T> SortByDescending<TKey>(Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector)
{
return new DataResult<T>(this.Query.OrderByDescending(keySelector));
}
public IDataResult<TResult> ProjectTo<TResult>(Expression<Func<T, TResult>> predicate)
{
return new DataResult<TResult>(this.Query.Select(predicate));
}
public List<T> ToList()
{
return this.Query.ToList();
}
public IEnumerable<T> AsEnumerable()
{
return this.Query.AsEnumerable();
}
}
这样,你还可以防止EF和DB相关的依赖性您的应用程序攀升。 T> 方法将被包含的传播,而不是所有的地方这个类中,
That way you can also prevent EF and DB related dependencies creeping up on your application. Any change on IQueryable<T>
methods will be contained within this class, instead of spread all over the place.
这篇关于冻结LINQ的IQueryable(作为了ToList()。AsQueryable已()会做)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!