borland vs. microsoft

据我所知，Borland已经放弃了对C ++的支持（就是它不打算创建更新版本的C ++ Builder），并保持Delphi。 但是除了之外还有其他的C ++编译器制造商用于Windows来自MS，就像英特尔一样。 我用Borland C ++编程。 Borland再也无法跟上微软，他们已经改变策略，专注于JBuilder，他们的 杀手级应用。 关于5- 10年前Borland是编译器，不再是微软已经成功杀死了另一个竞争对手。 我听说英特尔的编译器很好。你可以试试。对于Windows来说，很少有开源的c ++编译器可供开发C ++ http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html HTH - Surendra Singhi www.public.asu.edu/~sksinghi GNU C ++编译器更好。 Hi. Does anybody say that what is better borland c++ or visual c++?Which compiler does have more help? 解决方案 As far as I know, Borland has dropped the support for C++ (that is itdoes not intend to create a newer version of C++ Builder), and keeps Delphi.However there are other C++ compiler manufacturers for Windows exceptfrom MS, like Intel. --Ioannis Vranos http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys As far as I know, Borland has dropped the support for C++ (that is it does not intend to create a newer version of C++ Builder), and keeps Delphi. However there are other C++ compiler manufacturers for Windows except from MS, like Intel. I have programmed in Borland C++. Borland can no longer keep up withMicrosoft, they have changed their strategy to focus on JBuilder, theirkiller application.About 5-10 years back Borland was THE compiler, no longer Microsoft hassuccessfully killed another competetition. I have heard Intel''s compiler is good. You can try that. There are fewsort of open source c++ compiler for windows too ex- Dev C++ http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html HTH--Surendra Singhi www.public.asu.edu/~sksinghi The GNU C++ compiler is way better. 这篇关于borland vs. microsoft的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！