协变和逆变行动代表

问题描述

我卡住了，为什么不是这个工作：

I'm stuck, why isn't this working:

  var childAction = new Action<CancelCommand>(blabla);
  Action<IDomainCommand> upperAction = (Action<IDomainCommand>) childAction;

为什么没有这方面的工作，如果CancelCommand实现IDomainCommand？
顺便说一句：这是合作或逆变什么，我想在这里做什么？ ;）

Why isn't this working if CancelCommand implements IDomainCommand?By the way: Is this co or contravariance what i'm trying to do here? ;)

感谢您提前
只求最好
劳林

thank you in advancejust the bestlaurin

修改
谢谢你们的非常快速响应！

EDITThank you guys for your very fast responses!

为什么我需要这个是因为我建立一个通用的行动模板的问题。
我有以下接口：

The problem why i need this is because i construct a generic Action Template.I have the following Interface:

IMessageBus.RegisterAction<T>(Action<T> registerAction) where T : IDomainCommand

由于我必须建立在运行时我的代码lookes作为follwing这个动作：

Because i have to build this action on runtime my code lookes as the follwing:

var genericExecuteAction = this.GetType().GetMethod("ExecuteCommandAction",
                                                            BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance).MakeGenericMethod(commandType);

var actionType = typeof(Action<>).MakeGenericType(commandType);
var @delegate = Delegate.CreateDelegate(actionType, this, genericExecuteAction);
var actionDelegate = (Action<DomainCommandBase>)@delegate;

messageBus.Register(actionDelegate);

问题是我需要转换它，这样我可以把它传递给该方法。
你看到了什么？
，我们使用的是mesasge总线的背后是使用RX，不幸的是所有的方法有使用泛型，还有一个现在没有仿制过载。

The problem is i need to cast it so that i can pass it to this method.You see?Behind the mesasge bus we are using is using RX and unfortunately all the methods there use generics, there a now non-generic-overloads.

推荐答案

动作的类型参数是逆变的：你可以指定一个动作<对象> 来一个动作<字符串方式> 因为很明显，可以在任何物体上工作的方法也可以在一个字符串的工作。

The type parameter of Action is contravariant: you can assign an Action<object> to an Action<string> because obviously a method that can work on any object can also work on a string.

你在这里做的是试图法案，在 CancelCommand （派生型）的工作原理是在任何 IDomainCommand （基本型）。这在逻辑​​上是错误的，所以编译器不会让你这么做 - 如果它这样做，你可以只调用 upperAction 传递一个 DifferentTypeOfDomainCommand 。

What you do here is trying to bill a method that works on a CancelCommand (derived type) as a method that works on any IDomainCommand (base type). This is logically wrong, so the compiler doesn't let you do it -- if it did, you could just invoke upperAction passing it a DifferentTypeOfDomainCommand.

这篇关于协变和逆变行动代表的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！