本文介绍了具有单一属性密钥的BCNF是否意味着4NF?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想知道一个关系模式是否在BCNF中使用单一属性键,它会自动在4NF吗?

I would like to know if a relational schema is in BCNF with a single-attribute key, will it automatically be in 4NF?

我试图使用表格,但是如果答案是肯定的,我怎么才能正式证明它没有绘制表格。

I tried to derive it using table but how can I formally prove it without drawing table if the answer is yes.

推荐答案

书籍证明:


  • BCNF和所有键简单⟹5NF

  • BCNF和任何键简单⟹4NF

难度将找到合适的书。

[... time passeth ...书架的模糊部分正在搜索...]

我第一次遇到这本书的书是:

The book where I first came across it is:


  • 。定理在第29章保证关系数据库中更高正常形式的简单条件。

  • Relational Database: Writings 1989-1991. The theorems are in chapter 29, "Simple conditions for guaranteeing higher normal forms in relational databases".

它也由ACM发布:

(您可能需要获得该网页的权限。)

(You may need permission to get to that page.)

我的记忆轻微不准确;正确的定理是:

My memory was mildly inaccurate; the correct theorems are:

第一个结果比我最初声明的稍微强一些,因为BCNF中的所有关系都在3NF中,不在BCNF。第二个是正确的。

The first result is slightly stronger than I originally stated because all relations in BCNF are also in 3NF but some relations in 3NF are not in BCNF. The second was correctly stated.

这篇关于具有单一属性密钥的BCNF是否意味着4NF?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!