问题描述
嗯,我遇到了这个问题(描述很长,但是我认为很容易解决).我有三个文件:
Well, I've this problem (the description is long, but I think it is easy to solve) . I've three files:
nrtype.f90
,具有一些愚蠢的定义,但是由以下文件使用:
nrtype.f90
, which have some stupid definitions, but it is used by the following files:
module nrtype
integer, parameter :: I4B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(9)
integer, parameter :: I2B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(4)
integer, parameter :: I1B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(2)
integer, parameter :: SP = KIND(1.0)
integer, parameter :: DP = KIND(1.0D0)
endmodule nrtype
LUd.f90
,这是工作的一部分:
LUd.f90
, which makes part of the work:
module descomposicionLU
use nrtype
implicit none
contains
subroutine LUd(A, LU, bk)
implicit none
real(DP), intent (in), dimension(:,:) :: A
real(DP), intent (out), dimension(:,:) :: LU
integer(I2B), dimension(size(A,1),2) :: bk
<more code that doesn't worth to mention>
endsubroutine LUd
<more code that doesn't worth to mention>
endmodule descomposicionLU
一个名为FrontBackSub.f90
的文件,负责其他工作:
A file called FrontBackSub.f90
, which does the other part of the work:
module FrontBack
use nrtype
implicit none
contains
function FrontSLU(A,B) result (X)
implicit none
real(DP), dimension(:,:), intent (in) :: A, B
real(DP), dimension(size(B,1),size(B,2)) :: X
<more code>
endfunction FrontSLU
endmodule FrontBack
最后是main.f90
,就像这样:
program main
use descomposicionLU
use FrontBack
implicit none
integer, parameter :: N=3
real(DP), dimension(N,N) :: MA, MLU
integer(I2B), dimension(N,2) :: Vbk
MA(1,:)=(/1.0, 7.0, 11.0/)
MA(2,:)=(/14.0, 24.0, 19.0/)
MA(3,:)=(/7.0, 8.0, 9.0/)
call LUd(MA, MLU, Vbk)
endprogram main
但是,问题出在编译期间,我已经使用ifort nrtype.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 LUd.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 main.f90
:
But, the issue comes during compilation, with ifort nrtype.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 LUd.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 main.f90
i've got:
/tmp/ifortbW2y7D.o: In function `frontback._':
FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `frontback._'
/tmp/ifortVQdBCN.o:FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x0): first defined here
/tmp/ifortbW2y7D.o: In function `frontback_mp_frontslu_':
FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `frontback_mp_frontslu_'
/tmp/ifortVQdBCN.o:FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x10): first defined here
/tmp/ifortbW2y7D.o: In function `frontback_mp_backs_':
FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x460): multiple definition of `frontback_mp_backs_'
/tmp/ifortVQdBCN.o:FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x460): first defined here
或更清晰地说,请使用gfortran nrtype.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 LUd.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 main.f90
:
Or, more clear, with gfortran nrtype.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 LUd.f90 FrontBackSub.f90 main.f90
:
/tmp/ccpZnjOp.o: In function `__frontback_MOD_backs':
FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `__frontback_MOD_backs'
/tmp/ccsr4QjQ.o:FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x0): first defined here
/tmp/ccpZnjOp.o: In function `__frontback_MOD_frontslu':
FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x582): multiple definition of `__frontback_MOD_frontslu'
/tmp/ccsr4QjQ.o:FrontBackSub.f90:(.text+0x582): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
因此,它说FrontBackSub.f90
中的函数(它是复数的,因为当我添加新函数时,问题扩展到了它们)被多次定义,而显然没有.
So, it says that the functions (it is plural because when I add new functions the issue expand to them) in FrontBackSub.f90
are defined several times which, clearly, the are not.
我看不到的问题在哪里?
Where is the problem that I can't see?
感谢您的时间伙伴.
推荐答案
为什么在compile命令中有两次源FrontBackSub.f90
?只是不要这样做.
Why do you have the source FrontBackSub.f90
two times in the compile command? Just don't do that.
这篇关于fortran中的多定义链接错误(ifort-gfortran)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!