问题描述
目前,我的经验是,一段使用 Google Drive API 的代码在不引入 ProGuard 的情况下运行良好.
但是,在引入 ProGuard 后,我收到以下运行时错误.
在 java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:856)引起:java.lang.NullPointerException在 com.google.api.client.util.Types.getActualParameterAtPosition(Types.java:329)在 com.google.api.client.util.Types.getIterableParameter(Types.java:309)在 com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parseValue(JsonParser.java:546)在 com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parse(JsonParser.java:350)在 com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parseValue(JsonParser.java:586)在 com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parse(JsonParser.java:289)在 com.google.api.client.json.JsonObjectParser.parseAndClose(JsonObjectParser.java:76)在 com.google.api.client.json.JsonObjectParser.parseAndClose(JsonObjectParser.java:71)在 com.google.api.client.http.HttpResponse.parseAs(HttpResponse.java:491)在 com.google.api.client.googleapis.services.AbstractGoogleClientRequest.execute(AbstractGoogleClientRequest.java:456)在 com.jstock.c.b.a(CloudFile.java:136)
注意,崩溃发生在我的代码(如果我使用 mapping.txt 回溯,则为 com.jstock.c.b.a)
//请求是 Files.ListFileList files = request.execute();
在我的 proguard 中,我认为有以下 2 个关键指令,可以防止崩溃发生:我告诉 ProGuard 永远不要接触 jackson 和 Google 库.
-keep class org.codehaus.** { *;}-keep class com.google.** { *;}-保持接口org.codehaus.** { *;}-保持界面com.google.** { *;}
但这行不通.NPE 仍然发生在
Currently, I'm having experience that, a piece of code, which makes use of Google Drive API is running fine without introducing ProGuard.
However, after introducing ProGuard, I'm getting the following run-time error.
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:856)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.google.api.client.util.Types.getActualParameterAtPosition(Types.java:329)
at com.google.api.client.util.Types.getIterableParameter(Types.java:309)
at com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parseValue(JsonParser.java:546)
at com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parse(JsonParser.java:350)
at com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parseValue(JsonParser.java:586)
at com.google.api.client.json.JsonParser.parse(JsonParser.java:289)
at com.google.api.client.json.JsonObjectParser.parseAndClose(JsonObjectParser.java:76)
at com.google.api.client.json.JsonObjectParser.parseAndClose(JsonObjectParser.java:71)
at com.google.api.client.http.HttpResponse.parseAs(HttpResponse.java:491)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.services.AbstractGoogleClientRequest.execute(AbstractGoogleClientRequest.java:456)
at com.jstock.c.b.a(CloudFile.java:136)
Note, the crash happens at my code (which is com.jstock.c.b.a if I retrace using mapping.txt)
// request is Files.List
FileList files = request.execute();
In my proguard, I thought having the following 2 key instructions, able to prevent the crash from happen : I tell ProGuard never touch on jackson and Google libraries.
-keep class org.codehaus.** { *; }
-keep class com.google.** { *; }
-keep interface org.codehaus.** { *; }
-keep interface com.google.** { *; }
But that doesn't work. NPE still happen at Types.java
Note that, I had another try is that, I thought obfuscate process causes NPE happens. Hence, I try to disable it using -dontobfuscate
. But this time, I will not able to generate APK file, and getting a popular error message : Conversion to Dalvik format failed with error 1
Here is the proguard configuration which causes NPE at Google Drive API.
-optimizationpasses 1
-dontusemixedcaseclassnames
-dontskipnonpubliclibraryclasses
-dontpreverify
-verbose
-optimizations !code/simplification/arithmetic,!field/*,!class/merging/*
# Comment out the following line, will cause popular "Conversion to Dalvik format failed with error 1"
##-dontobfuscate
-dontwarn sun.misc.Unsafe
-dontwarn com.google.common.collect.MinMaxPriorityQueue
-dontwarn javax.swing.**
-dontwarn java.awt.**
-dontwarn org.jasypt.encryption.pbe.**
-dontwarn java.beans.**
-dontwarn org.joda.time.**
-dontwarn com.google.android.gms.**
-dontwarn org.w3c.dom.bootstrap.**
-dontwarn com.ibm.icu.text.**
-dontwarn demo.**
# Hold onto the mapping.text file, it can be used to unobfuscate stack traces in the developer console using the retrace tool
-printmapping mapping.txt
# Keep line numbers so they appear in the stack trace of the develeper console
-keepattributes *Annotation*,EnclosingMethod,SourceFile,LineNumberTable
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.app.backup.BackupAgentHelper
-keep public class * extends android.preference.Preference
-keep public class com.android.vending.licensing.ILicensingService
-keep class android.support.v4.app.** { *; }
-keep interface android.support.v4.app.** { *; }
-keep class com.actionbarsherlock.** { *; }
-keep interface com.actionbarsherlock.** { *; }
# https://sourceforge.net/p/proguard/discussion/182456/thread/e4d73acf
-keep class org.codehaus.** { *; }
-keep class com.google.** { *; }
-keep interface org.codehaus.** { *; }
-keep interface com.google.** { *; }
-assumenosideeffects class android.util.Log {
public static int d(...);
public static int i(...);
public static int e(...);
public static int v(...);
}
-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
native <methods>;
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}
-keepclassmembers class * extends android.app.Activity {
public void *(android.view.View);
}
-keepclassmembers enum * {
public static **[] values();
public static ** valueOf(java.lang.String);
}
-keep class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
public static final android.os.Parcelable$Creator *;
}
-assumenosideeffects class android.util.Log {
public static *** d(...);
public static *** v(...);
public static *** i(...);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class com.google.common.base.internal.Finalizer{
<methods>;
}
Is there anything else I can try?
I'm not sure it might be caused by the combination of the libraries. (Although things run pretty well without introducing ProGuard)
If I look at the NPE crash location (Types.getActualParameterAtPosition(Types.java:329))
private static Type getActualParameterAtPosition(Type type, Class<?> superClass, int position) {
ParameterizedType parameterizedType = Types.getSuperParameterizedType(type, superClass);
Type valueType = parameterizedType.getActualTypeArguments()[position];
// this is normally a type variable, except in the case where the class of iterableType is
// superClass, e.g. Iterable<String>
if (valueType instanceof TypeVariable<?>) {
Type resolve = Types.resolveTypeVariable(Arrays.asList(type), (TypeVariable<?>) valueType);
if (resolve != null) {
return resolve;
}
}
return valueType;
}
I suspect Types.getSuperParameterizedType
returning null
. So, I further look into Types.getSuperParameterizedType
.
public static ParameterizedType getSuperParameterizedType(Type type, Class<?> superClass) {
if (type instanceof Class<?> || type instanceof ParameterizedType) {
outer: while (type != null && type != Object.class) {
Class<?> rawType;
if (type instanceof Class<?>) {
// type is a class
rawType = (Class<?>) type;
} else {
// current is a parameterized type
ParameterizedType parameterizedType = (ParameterizedType) type;
rawType = getRawClass(parameterizedType);
// check if found Collection
if (rawType == superClass) {
// return the actual collection parameter
return parameterizedType;
}
if (superClass.isInterface()) {
for (Type interfaceType : rawType.getGenericInterfaces()) {
// interface type is class or parameterized type
Class<?> interfaceClass =
interfaceType instanceof Class<?> ? (Class<?>) interfaceType : getRawClass(
(ParameterizedType) interfaceType);
if (superClass.isAssignableFrom(interfaceClass)) {
type = interfaceType;
continue outer;
}
}
}
}
// move on to the super class
type = rawType.getGenericSuperclass();
}
}
return null;
}
What is the possible root cause that may cause getSuperParameterizedType
returning null
, after processed by ProGuard?
A combination of the following has worked for me:
-keep class com.google.** { *;}
-keep interface com.google.** { *;}
-dontwarn com.google.**
-dontwarn sun.misc.Unsafe
-dontwarn com.google.common.collect.MinMaxPriorityQueue
-keepattributes *Annotation*,Signature
-keep class * extends com.google.api.client.json.GenericJson {
*;
}
-keep class com.google.api.services.drive.** {
*;
}
This provided a working proguard compatible solution for a recent Google Drive project.
Cannot take all credit for this solution though, originally found at this link here
这篇关于Google Drive API 无法与 ProGuard (NPE) 配合使用的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!