公证变更交易从验证到非验证公证

问题描述

在进行从验证公证人到一组新的非验证公证人的公证变更交易时，新的一组非验证公证人如何了解以前的交易？。

while doing a notary change transaction from validating notaries to a new set of non validating notaries, how does the new set of non-validating notaries learn about the previous transactions?.

它们是否仅获得先前交易的哈希或整个交易依赖关系图？

Do they get only the hashes of previous transactions or the entire transaction dependency graph?

推荐答案

新公证人不会学习

相反，我们有以下过程：

Instead, we have the following process:

• 具有哈希值 2772BE 和公证人 NotaryA 的交易被提交到分类账


• 有人希望将此交易的第一个输出状态（表示为< 2772BE，0> ）转移到 NotaryB


• 它们使用单​​个输入< 2772BE，0> 组成公证更改交易。假设此公证更改交易的哈希值为 35D0A5


• NotaryA 符号此交易，将其输入< 2772BE，0> 标记为已使用


• 但是，此交易还会创建一个输出状态< 35D0A5，0> ，指向 NotaryB


• NotaryA 的>< 2772BE，0> 。但是指向 NotaryB 的< 35D0A5，0> 未使用

• A transaction with hash 2772BE and notary NotaryA is committed to the ledger
• Someone wants to transfer the first output state of this transaction (denoted <2772BE, 0>) to NotaryB
• They form a notary change transaction with a single input, <2772BE, 0>. Let's say the hash of this notary change transaction is 35D0A5
• NotaryA signs this transaction, marking its input <2772BE, 0> as spent
• However, this transaction also creates one output state, <35D0A5, 0>, pointing to NotaryB
• <2772BE, 0>, which pointed to NotaryA, is now spent. But <35D0A5, 0>, which points to NotaryB, is unspent

通过这种方式，我们已将州转移到新的公证处，以防止重复支出。

In this way, we have transferred the state to a new notary in a way that prevents double-spends.

这篇关于公证变更交易从验证到非验证公证的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！