一种机制，用于在Collection中的对象上具有不同的equals（物理equals和logical equals）

...但是您可以将它与不同的ListEqualator实现重用。 Is there any Equalator mechanism like Comparator so I can have different equals for coparing lists?EDIT: My goal is to differentiate between current list1.equals(list2) which checks if its a shallow copy or also a deep copy with all objects a.equals(b) and list1.identical(list2) which checks if its simply shallow copy with unmodified listingAll these lists are from the same model. Some are copies of themselves so they hold the pointer to same objects, and others are deep copies so hierarchy is totally replicated, because they have updates in content, not just in structure.I find myself oftenly makin list1.equals(list2) but I need a mechanism for telling if both are TOTAL copies (same objects in same order for collections) or sometimes if they are LOGICAL copies (through my own implemented logic equals), so list would call equals and objects should implement something more than a==b.My problem is there is no Equalator interface, and if I override objects equals to I loose the capability of comparing by TOTAL EQUAL (a==b)For example, this would be nice;Collections.equal(l1,l2,new Equalator(){ @Override public boolean equals(Obj1,Obj2){ //Default lists comparison plus commparison of objects based on return (obj1.propertyX() == obj2.propertyX()); }});and still I could do list1.equals(list2) so they use default equals (obj1==obj2) and this would be only true if contained objects are exactly the same.First operation is useful for checking if list (which could be an updated list with totally recreated objects from the model) is still equals to the old list. Second operation is useful for checking if list (which was a shallow copy of the old current version of data model), it does not contain any transcendent change from moving it around inside the code when it was the udpdated version. EDIT: A very good example would be having a list of Point(x,y). We should be able to know if both list are equal because they are exactly same set of points or equal because the points they contain are equal in a logical way. If we could implement both phyEqual and logEqual to object, and have both methods in any object so list.phyEqual(list2) or list1.logEqual(list2) 解决方案 A late answer, but maybe it will be useful for someone...The Guava Equivalence class is the same for equivalence as Comparator for comparing. You would need to write your own method for comparing the lists (there is no support in Guava for that), but then you could call this method with various equivalence-definitions.Or you can roll your own interface:interface Equalator<T> { boolean equals(T o1, T o2);}Again, you need to write your (trivial) methodboolean <T> listEquals(List<T> list1, List<T> list2, Equalator<T> equalator) { ... }...but then you can reuse it with different ListEqualator implementations. 这篇关于一种机制，用于在Collection中的对象上具有不同的equals（物理equals和logical equals）的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！